Fire can do that, you know! If it can melt candles, ice, or your flesh, it can melt stell an concreat an that's why it came down. It simply melted like a candle (except a lil faster)!
2006-09-12 16:06:42 · 18 answers · asked by ? 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
I'm talkin fires from the jet fuel, you dumb *****!
2006-09-12 16:16:28 · update #1
That's like saying, if I can make a peanut butter and jelly sandwich, i can be a top chef. Do you know any physical properties of steel and concrete? for your information, they are different than wax and human flesh. I hope your political beliefs are more stronger than your scientific ones.
2006-09-12 16:12:50 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
Jet Fuel, basically Kerosene, does not burn as hot at gasoline, and would burn off rather quickly leaving only the office furniture, treated resist burning, and would burn a much lower temperatures then what is required to melt the tresses. Also, the central, load bearing supports would not have been effected if the fires had caused catastrophic losses in the tresses. Whatever did occur on 9/11 is not contained in the official reports.
2006-09-12 23:55:23 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well, there will always be people who insist on believing nonsense.
Hence, all the WTC conspiracy theories and also why conservatives believe Vince Foster was murdered (by the Clintons!). It's all quite laughable.
Seriously, though, with such a lying sack of sh*t in the White House no wonder people think everything is a lie.
Just for the record: I accept the official record re: 9/11, including the documented nearly criminal mishandling of the aftermath of the attacks by the Bush Administration.
2006-09-12 23:42:13 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
This conspiracy theory is the bandwagon unintelligent Bush haters are jumping on. A few simple minded people with the hopes of getting their name heard put this crap out there and the Bush bashers eat it up. Few of them have read the official report, which explains in painfully good detail what happened, and the ones who did don't understand it, so they believe this biased, one-sided crap. I am sick of hearing about this. ALL Americans have the right to question this government, but they should also have ALL the facts to back those opinions up if they are going to dishonor the Americans that died that day. I'll bet none of them even paid any tribute yesterday to those who died, DESPICABLE!
2006-09-12 23:27:42 · answer #4 · answered by ? 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Then what would they have to blame President Bush for?Geez you know he planted bombs there himself..,for being a so called stupid man he has amazing knowlege doesnt he?Or and his magical powers that caused hurricane Katrina to hit Louisiana..,New Orleans..and its amazing the only ones that blame him for that is New Orleans..,you dont hear the rest of Louisiana crying or Mississippi.So the more the Libs come up with these off the wall Art Bell/George Norrie conspiracy theories the smarter they make our President sound..,but they are too stupid to realize that.
2006-09-12 23:15:31 · answer #5 · answered by halfbright 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
so far, i have yet to read a response here that digs into the real physics behind the event. yes, there IS an answer to the question "could they fall on themselves?" there IS an explanation in physics that can explain how they fell, and why they fell. in fact, if you go back to the newspapers following that horrific day, the explanation is in print. but of course, that would negate the chance to take a political stab at a conspiracy theory that simply doesn't exist.
2006-09-12 23:16:17 · answer #6 · answered by The Beast 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Because it is much easier to believe in a conspiracy than to understand basic physics.
The towers fell for the same reason a bombed house collapses or a house will burn and then fall in.
But then you couldn't blame the government of President Bush and everyone knows President Bush is to blame for every catastrophe in the world.
2006-09-12 23:16:41 · answer #7 · answered by Akkita 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
To do so would be admitting that they are wrong. Have you ever heard of a lib doing that?
And to the other fellow that made the reference to #7. Popular mechanics magazine did an in depth study of all of data, and guess what? #7 was indeed hit by a large amount Of debris. Look it up on the net! I myself heard the editor being interviewed.
2006-09-12 23:36:44 · answer #8 · answered by It All Matters.~☺♥ 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes........ they fell all by themselves from the jet fuel that was from the planes that nobody knew about that flew themselves into the towers.....Yeah.......you go ahead and keep telling yourself that.........Oh and if you want to be a technical retard about it gravity actually brought them down.......
2006-09-12 23:30:35 · answer #9 · answered by ☠Naz☠ 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Your right! Why didn't I figure it out? I think it was too many people in there thinking bad things about our fearless leader Lil 'w' and God smited them.. Right?
( I wouldn't have ever given that answer if I didn't know you were kidding).
I can't believe so many people are taking this question seriously.
StJames lives!!!!
2006-09-12 23:14:25 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋