How come the media hardly ever mentions the third tower that fell on 9/11?

Answer 1

The media is a business like any other and all it wants to do is sell the product. Bad news sells, good news bores people, hence, the media concentrates on the extreme situations. In this case, it was the planes that hit the towers, the pentagon and the field in Pennsylvania. The other building - 7 I think - collapsed as a result of being damaged, but not because a plane flew into it killing several hundred people in one fell swoop.

Answer 2

When examining what caused WTC 7 to collapse it becomes blatantly obvious that it was a controlled demolition. The 47-story building fell at free-fall speed into it's own footprint despite only suffering from small fires. Demolition experts have claimed it was the most perfect job they had ever seen. The building's owner, Larry Silverstein, even admitted that the building was "pulled". Furthermore, WTC 7 was never even mentioned in the 9/11 Commission Report. But how can this be?
US GOVERNMENT COMPLICITY IN THE 9/11 ATTACKS!!!

Answer 3

That heightened security for the World Trade Centre was lifted immediately prior to the attacks illustrates that it always happens when you least expect it.

That Hani Hanjour, the pilot of Flight 77, was so incompetent he could not fly a Cessna in August, but in September managed to fly a 767 at excessive speed into a spiraling, 270-degree descent and a level impact of the first floor of the Pentagon, on the only side that was virtually empty and had been hardened to withstand a terrorist attack, merely demonstrates that people can do almost anything once they set their minds to it.

That none of the flight data recorders were said to be recoverable even though they were located in the tail sections, and that until 9/11, no solid-state recorder in a catastrophic crash had been unrecoverable, shows how there's a first time for everything.

That Mohammed Atta left a uniform, a will, a Koran, his driver's license and a "how to fly planes" video in his rental car at the airport means he had other things on his mind.

The mention of Israelis with links to military-intelligence having been arrested on Sept 11 videotaping and celebrating the attacks, of an Israeli espionage ring surveiling DEA and defense installations and trailing the hijackers, and of a warning of impending attacks delivered to the Israeli company Odigo two hours before the first plane hit, does not deserve a response. That the stories also appeared in publications such as Ha'aretz and Forward is a sad display of self-hatred among certain elements of the Israeli media.

That multiple military wargames and simulations were underway the morning of 9/11 – one simulating the crash of a plane into a building; another, a live-fly simulation of multiple hijackings – and took many interceptors away from the eastern seaboard and confused field commanders as to which was a real hijacked aircraft and which was a hoax, was a bizarre coincidence, but no less a coincidence.

That the National Military Command Center ops director asked a rookie substitute to stand his watch at 8:30 am on Sept. 11 is nothing more than bad timing.

That a recording made Sept 11 of air traffic controllers’ describing what they had witnessed, was destroyed by an FAA official who crushed it in his hand, cut the tape into little pieces and dropped them in different trash cans around the building, is something no doubt that overzealous official wishes he could undo.

Answer 4

I assume you're talking about the Marriott Hotel, likely because it was not a part of the complex controlled by the New York Port Authority. It also was more a symbol of opulence, and something only the rich could afford, whereas the towers were places where people worked.

Answer 5

I was at home watching ER and reading a book, and i looked at the TV and saw 2 towers were on fire and thought the channel got changed and was a movie. I found out that is was real and into shock, how could this happen here, i watched it until i had to go to work everyone was in shock and afraid.

Answer 6

It wasn't really a tower. The WTC towers were much larger,so the media focuses on them.

Answer 7

because it blows a huge wide-open gaping hole in the official story ... and any rational american with a third grade education ... if they actually turn on that little lightbulb they call a brain ... can figure out that there is no logical explanation for it other than it was demo'd ... which would have required days if not weeks of prior planning hence implicating a massive coverup ... but just drop it ur going to get the dimwits whining again.

Answer 8

I've wondered that too. I guess it just doesn't fit into the "Twin Towers" image.

Answer 9

The news yesterday reported that WTC #7 has already been rebuilt.

Answer 10

Try a different media.