I've seen some messages regarding getting insurance to pay for a tubal reversal when its technically not a covered procedure, but I'm not sure how I feel about that. For instance, finding a doctor who will do the procedure and file the insurance claim as "removal of blockage of fallopian tube" or something like that. While I would love to be able to find a way to have the TR faster, I'm not sure that's an ethical move. I believe God made the way for Tony and I to be together and appreciate the love we share. I believe we will find a way to have the TR so that we can at least have a chance at having a baby together, concieved and born out of that love. But Tony and I want everything right with our marriage, and I'm not sure masking the tr as something else would be right. What do you think???
2006-09-12
14:31:18
·
8 answers
·
asked by
tonysdoll815
2
in
Pregnancy & Parenting
➔ Trying to Conceive