I gives good reason why Christ might have actually been born in 1053 and was cruxified in 1086. It tells that John could have only written the book of Revelation in 1486, due to the similarities of his symbology and the zodiac of the time. It talks about how the classical era never existed. It says that the ancient lunar eclipses were blatantly wrongly dated.
I'm not sure what to think of all this. I'm thinking of buying the book, but I want to know if anyone of intelligence has read it and thinks it's a load of crap before I do.
2006-09-12
14:25:36
·
2 answers
·
asked by
Rockstar
6
in
Arts & Humanities
➔ History