English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I gives good reason why Christ might have actually been born in 1053 and was cruxified in 1086. It tells that John could have only written the book of Revelation in 1486, due to the similarities of his symbology and the zodiac of the time. It talks about how the classical era never existed. It says that the ancient lunar eclipses were blatantly wrongly dated.

I'm not sure what to think of all this. I'm thinking of buying the book, but I want to know if anyone of intelligence has read it and thinks it's a load of crap before I do.

2006-09-12 14:25:36 · 2 answers · asked by Rockstar 6 in Arts & Humanities History

2 answers

Why not head over to Amazon.com and read some of the book's customer reviews at the link below:

2006-09-13 00:56:51 · answer #1 · answered by Answers1 6 · 0 0

The above solutions are classics of the Sci Fi style, yet is probably no longer precise for you. it may be much less complicated in case you had an occasion of a SciFi e book you have study that doesn't have aliens. My favorites continuously have aliens. And laser weapons! some could classify Michael Crichton as SciFi. i'm attempting to think of of different close to destiny SciFi. in case you prefer to objective aliens, google John Scalzi.

2016-11-07 05:11:10 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers