English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Bush or the fanatics the US is against? (I guess it is mainly for liberals)

2006-09-12 14:23:52 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

no, i am not singling them out, except that maybe they should ask themselves this question. Maybe you should also, since you are frieghtened to answer it.

2006-09-12 14:30:34 · update #1

8 answers

Whatever. By qualifing your question with the statement in parentheses (I guess it is mainly for liberals) you're singling out a group of people to get bashed. LIBERALS - don't answer this question!

2006-09-12 14:26:39 · answer #1 · answered by ReeRee 6 · 0 0

Let's see,... the fanatics celebrated and cheered the killing of 3,000 random civilian Americans, ...men, women, children, anyone simply going through their average day minding their own business. This was basically because our religion isn't the same as theirs. Gotta love a "religion" that promises rewards in the afterlife for murdering innocent people.

2006-09-12 21:38:23 · answer #2 · answered by dropdeaddaverage 1 · 1 0

I hate the fanatics more. I don't really hate bush at all. I don't love him, like his followers, but he's just a man, and humans can make mistakes.

2006-09-12 21:25:42 · answer #3 · answered by merlin_steele 6 · 2 0

I dislike the fanatics who support this LIE in iraq!
That governments have permitted terrorist acts against their own people, and have even themselves been perpetrators in order to find strategic advantage is quite likely true, but this is the United States we're talking about.

That intelligence agencies, financiers, terrorists and narco-criminals have a long history together is well established, but the Nugan Hand Bank, BCCI, Banco Ambrosiano, the P2 Lodge, the CIA/Mafia anti-Castro/Kennedy alliance, Iran/Contra and the rest were a long time ago, so there’s no need to rehash all that. That was then, this is now!

That Jonathan Bush’s Riggs Bank has been found guilty of laundering terrorist funds and fined a US-record $25 million must embarrass his nephew George, but it's still no justification for leaping to paranoid conclusions.

That George Bush's brother Marvin sat on the board of the Kuwaiti-owned company which provided electronic security to the World Trade Centre, Dulles Airport and United Airlines means nothing more than you must admit those Bush boys have done alright for themselves.

That George Bush found success as a businessman only after the investment of Osama’s brother Salem and reputed al Qaeda financier Khalid bin Mahfouz is just one of those things - one of those crazy things.

That Osama bin Laden is known to have been an asset of US foreign policy in no way implies he still is.

That al Qaeda was active in the Balkan conflict, fighting on the same side as the US as recently as 1999, while the US protected its cells, is merely one of history's little aberrations.

The claims of Michael Springman, State Department veteran of the Jeddah visa bureau, that the CIA ran the office and issued visas to al Qaeda members so they could receive training in the United States, sound like the sour grapes of someone who was fired for making such wild accusations.

That one of George Bush's first acts as President, in January 2001, was to end the two-year deployment of attack submarines which were positioned within striking distance of al Qaeda's Afghanistan camps, even as the group's guilt for the Cole bombing was established, proves that a transition from one administration to the next is never an easy task.

2006-09-12 21:26:06 · answer #4 · answered by dstr 6 · 1 3

Well Bush has killed almost as many Americans as Al Qaeda. Let's see... 3,000 died on 9/11... 2,500 have died in Iraq. Pretty simple math there. Bush is catching up.

2006-09-12 21:36:34 · answer #5 · answered by dark_phoenix 4 · 0 1

I dislike George Bush because he got us bogged down in a war that there is no way to win!

2006-09-12 21:34:58 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

i would have to go with fanstics because they have always had hate in their heart but bush has only been stupid since he got into office.

2006-09-12 21:27:07 · answer #7 · answered by darkvamp4542 3 · 0 0

liberal fanatics

2006-09-12 22:19:12 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers