HE wants them called terrorists and not called what they ARE...but I guess it depends of what the meaning of ARE is doesn't it...
He studied at the Clinton Institute for Liberal Semantics so we shouldn't be surprised.
2006-09-12 13:18:21 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I think it is an appropriate term.
They are Islamic and those the president refers to are fascists.
If you live in this Senators district, vote this guy out.
There are many more important issues we need to deal with than worrying about what the president calls a bunch of suicidal radicals don't you think?
It's a waste of time.
And for those who are Islamic, you have a responsibility to weed out those bad seeds because you are the ones affected by their hate and death and destruction.
So if you are from one of those countries reading this now, hunt down those radical Islamic fascists and lock them up.
I don't want to hear how peaceful your religion is. Do something about it and show the American people that you will not tolerate these heinous acts from you neighbor.
Those in the middle eastern states know who is doing what. But you do nothing to stop it.
So if you are offended by the term, than do something about it and show us Americans you are a peaceful people and prove to me you mean it by taking action in your own land and stopping your radical neighbor from blowing up innocent people.
2006-09-12 13:28:06 · answer #1 · answered by dudenj84 2 · 3⤊ 3⤋
really the whole thing is about semantics... why did Bush start even calling them that? To make them sound even worse of course... and should we change the name to "war on Islamic Fascism"?
it's all a bit silly and both sides push the semantic envelope as hard as they can...
2006-09-12 20:21:44 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
There is a fine line between Osama bin Laden (terrorist) and Maumoud Ahmadenijhad (Fascist). I'm sorry neither you nor President Bush are intelligent enough to see that.
Throwing all our enemies into one pile will only lead to the disadvantages of our own forces. The point is, Iran is NOT the same threat as bin Laden.
2006-09-12 20:23:48 · answer #3 · answered by Tofu Jesus 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Sen Feingold is my Senator. He is a Rhodes Scholar and is very well respected.
He, along with Sen McCain, wrote the McCain-Feingold Campaign Finance Reform.
I agree with Sen Feingold.
2006-09-12 20:26:23 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
I agree with Feingold. I hear the term terrorist about ten times a day and the term Islamic fascism maybe three times in my life. It is mainly neo-conservative propaganda term used to give a terrorism a nationality.
2006-09-12 20:37:24 · answer #5 · answered by ecogeek4ever 6 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Libs can't call anything what it is and they only plan they have is the destruction of AMERICA! I study at the EIB Network!!!!
2006-09-12 20:34:11 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
It's because he is one of them.
Note - Michael Savage coined " islamo facist / ism
http://michaelsavage.com
2006-09-12 20:24:10 · answer #7 · answered by nardo84 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Bush = Christian (Terrorist) le-Nutcase!
You're not the only one that can call names.
2006-09-12 20:22:58 · answer #8 · answered by freetinka 1 · 2⤊ 3⤋
cause its too close to his religion
2006-09-12 20:20:20 · answer #9 · answered by shut up dummy 6 · 2⤊ 3⤋
I believe that he is correct.
2006-09-12 20:21:03 · answer #10 · answered by kobacker59 6 · 2⤊ 3⤋