English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

13 answers

Oh please...horoscopes are so not real. I don't even understand why people bother reading them. So no, it won't mess up with the horoscopes. Pssh.

2006-09-12 12:46:59 · answer #1 · answered by Jazz 2 · 0 1

Pluto handles what absolutely has to happen, process, birth, growth, and rebirth are all under his jurisdiction.Hades, the guy with the office in the basement rules Pluto.Hes in charge of the scary stuff, he loves black, hates the spotlight, and always works below the surface. Head of the department of death, decay, destruction, and other unavoidables.He disposes of situations that have gone past the point of no return, that absolutely must go.You can't fire Hades! If anything, by declassifying (dwarfing) a planet that does all its work behind the scenes, or hidden, we've just empowered him on his own terms. Once the spotlight is taken off Pluto. I'll say 2008 when Pluto moves into Capricorn, it will start the deconstruction process of governments.This has to happen if were ever going to start the age of Aquarius 2012.

2006-09-13 06:41:28 · answer #2 · answered by Pablo 3 · 0 0

No not really

Astrology has to do with placement of objects and some of the larger asteroids are also computed

Astrology is an art form, much like clinical Psychology. There is no hard and fast science to Clinical Pschology, just successful praticitioners who are trained in a varity of methods and have a knack of doing what they do.

Astrologers are the same way.

(And no ranters on CLINICAL Pschology, please, I studied the field for over 10 years and read just about everything there is to read -- Laboratry pschology, pyschometry examinations, behavioral science and modification and Pschiatray are all different disciplines and they count as reasonably harder sciences with predicatable results... A Pschiatrist will prescribe Ritlan for your over active child and you will see the results in 60 minutes, although it has some undersireable side effects, it does work, hence it is predicatable science, "talking at you" therapy is not predictable science).

Astronomy is becoming more and more the bunk field. They can't even define a planet in acceptable terms and the whole scientfic community is in an uproar with more scientists REJECTION Pluto's demotion than accepting it.

Watch astronomy put a spin on things when they send a probe to some start they "think" has planets and it doesn't. They'll give you creative explaination as to why they got it wrong!

Astronomy get's it's credibility from math and the Laws of Newton as they apply in normal space. That's physics and math. Those two elements predicted Pluto and even gave visual Astronmer Clyde Tombaugh a location to look for Pluto.

Astronomy originally got it's Math from Astrolgers. These "horoscope" people were the first to chart the skies and develop algorithms to predict, with amazing accuracy, the returns of planets.

Not bad for a bunch of foo bars, eh!

I come from that old league when I used to do the math with pencil, paper and calcuator.

Most modern astrologers and phone psychics use cheat sheets or programs.

It's the one's who do the pencil pushing that hit the mark with your chart, which by the way doesn't predict the future, but only shows inclination.

An astrologer has a handle on and can even move you around on the chess board with just a birth date and time of birth.

It takes a psycholoigst a few 50 minute sessions (at $100 an hour) to get up to speed with you.

2006-09-12 14:08:34 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Take a few minutes and really mentally chew on your question for a moment in the light of "Astrology". All these many years Astrologists have been writing about people's futures based upon the alignment of the planets along with other so-called factors. Now if "Pluto" was a planetary factor in the writing and determining of many people's "futures", then how could these determinations be at all true, if Pluto is indeed considered NOT to be a planet?? And if not a planet now, then it certainly was not a planet THEN (although we were ignorant of the fact), yet nevertheless these "Astrologists" used Pluto in the writing and charting of countless millions of peoples lives!! So the conclusion is, that either Pluto is indeed and always will be a "planet"...or (as I believe), Astrologists are totally and completely FRAUDS.

2006-09-12 13:45:23 · answer #4 · answered by LARRY M 3 · 0 1

Hi. No, horoscopes predated Pluto by many years.

2006-09-12 12:48:04 · answer #5 · answered by Cirric 7 · 0 0

First, astrology is a farce in my opinion, but even so, most astrologers will continue to use Pluto's location for their predictions. Problem I have is what did they do before they even knew about Pluto. Doesn't that mean all their predictions before 1930 are/were all wrong? So, if they were wrong then aren't they all still wrong and a joke now?

2006-09-12 13:25:01 · answer #6 · answered by quntmphys238 6 · 1 0

aatronomy and astrology dont even begin to overlap because if you want planets then why is the sun part of the astrological stuff its still a big outerspace thingy that so you can still have your horoscope stuff. . . . besides why would man's definition of "planet" change something as mystical as astrology.

2006-09-12 12:51:52 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

It didn't seem to mess with horoscopes before it was discovered.

2006-09-12 12:51:34 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Oh my! Away with the horoscopes. They're nothing but rubbish.

2006-09-12 12:50:33 · answer #9 · answered by Giuleah 3 · 0 0

Horoscopes aren't completly accurate.....but if you believe them, then yes

2006-09-12 13:18:05 · answer #10 · answered by ? 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers