And they threw big Dick Chaney in the same pot of soup.
2006-09-12 11:40:20 · 15 answers · asked by 43 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Acording to both Strunk and White, and the Chicago Rules. This is not an absolute and either a or an can be exchanged to adjust the meter (sic) meter is my own wording I do not recall the exact wording.
So do you think an liar flows better than a liar? I chose a for it's harsh tone.
2006-09-12 11:50:44 · update #1
Sorry Steve there is a NEW report out.
Most News outlets are talking about it today.
2006-09-12 12:47:26 · update #2
because he is????
HA HA HA you just said "senate" and "intelligence" in the same sentence
2006-09-12 11:45:58 · answer #1 · answered by mymadsky 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Senate Intel Committee Report Proves Bush Still Isn’t Telling the Truth
Long delayed, heavily censored and only partially complete, the new Senate Intelligence Committee report is still devastating to the administration: President Bush, Vice-President Cheney and other senior officials systematically misled the American public on the ties between Saddam Hussein and Osama bin Laden.
The two sections of the report released late Friday also shows finally and definitively that there were not any nuclear, biological or chemical weapons in Iraq at the time President Bush ordered U.S. troops to invade the country; that there were no programs to produce such weapons; and that the programs had been shut down years earlier.
The report also reveals for the first time that the CIA’s own internal review concluded last fall that there was no pre-war connection between Saddam and Al Qaeda leader Abu Musab al-Zarqawi.
Also:
Now comes the conservative American Bar Association--400,000 lawyers--whose House of Delegates has overwhelmingly approved a task force report accusing President Bush, in polite legal language, of violating both the Constitution and federal law. ABA President Michael S. Greco sent it to Mr. Bush with a cover letter dated February 13, 2006 (see www.abanet.org/op/domsurv for the full report).
The report was never made public knowledge through the media..????
2006-09-12 12:19:36 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
reason Bush did not pay them to close up. Wuzzup! circulate Double Mint circulate! i'm now a eco-friendly Double Mint social gathering supporter. Paul ok quoted on 9/7/06: "Double Mint. the two the R and the D look to entice the "severe". i've got faith the solutions are many times interior the middle and that i understand the pick for compromise. I additionally think of that's needed understand the guy. as quickly as I vote, that's often a million/4 R, a million/4 D, the the rest are self sustaining or left sparkling."
2016-10-14 22:38:13 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ether you misunderstand the Senate Intelligence Committee report, or you listen to Democrat lies about what President Bush said. BTW the report you read about this week is 3 years old.
2006-09-12 12:38:36 · answer #4 · answered by STEVEN F 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
2 things dawg. 1) He lied about Iraq. a) the connection between Saddam and Al Qaida b) the weapons of mass deception and c) the duration of the war including the rebuilding there and
2) he ordered wiretapping of certain international calls to and from the U.S. without a warrant. Basically he went overboard on his executive powers.Some find it unconstitutional.
A drug=An Opiate= George Smack Him.
I don't know, you want an angry black man? Let's see you say that to Muhammad Ali.
I doubt you'll even find the words.
Go double mint go!
2006-09-12 12:02:19 · answer #5 · answered by Egroeg_Rorepme 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
an unmitigated. When the a is followed by a word that begins with a vowel, it becomes an.Not to be a dick.Im just bored.
Uh because he is.
2006-09-12 11:43:05 · answer #6 · answered by stephaniemariewalksonwater 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
bush is one of two things: He is a liar, or he is ignorant. If he is getting information from unreliable sources, then he is stupid for continually believing the same unreliable source. If not, then he is a liar and wants to instill fear into people for the sake of continuing his mess in Iraq and the Middle East. It's up to people to start making that choice. I choose liar...
To I don't know: You really don't, do you?
2006-09-12 11:45:47 · answer #7 · answered by linus_van_pelt68 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Because the lying lib-tards (R.I.N.O.s and dim-witted Dems) on the Senate panel thought they could get away with foisting off their fairy tale to the American public...
Only the lib-tards in the public buy it though as you apparently did...LOL!
2006-09-12 11:48:53 · answer #8 · answered by juandos 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
You're going to have to back that up, sweetheart, and not with a link to some propoganda website.
2006-09-12 11:46:24 · answer #9 · answered by RAR24 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
check out the entire
9/11 section
in www.jeanvaljeanlives.com
2006-09-12 11:52:33 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋