2006-09-12 11:28:58 · 26 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Football ➔ English Football
Adidas!!
2006-09-12 11:30:25 · answer #1 · answered by Tanya 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hey the saints... judging by the looks.. I'll go for Nike's...But you cant really judge a shoe by the look itself.. you gotta have the feel...
Maybe your planning on grabbing some right?? anyways.. If you do..., Be sure to follow this tips olright...?
What kind of shoes are better for training? And for racing? For everyone at our clinics we recommend light weight shoes with thin soles. There is a certain philosophy behind this recommendation, which consists of several concepts:
1. The shoes should be light, so that their weight didn't deteriorate the feeling of the foot as a part of the leg. It means that the feeling of the foot wouldn't differ from the feeling of the whole leg, psychologically. Biomechanically it may affect the foot transfer in space and time: its speed, acceleration, and trajectory, which could all be deteriorated by heavy shoes. We can deliberately use heavy shoes for some special occasions of strength development, but not for a long time, and surely not permanently.
2. The shoes should have thin soles, with no cushioning at all. It reduces the weight, but this is not the main reason. First of all, it allows you to develop a very precise, refined feeling of interaction between the foot and the ground, while landing. Obviously, it is impossible to do this through a thick shoe sole. In a movement, when every hundredth of a second counts (the time of support in best runners is 0.15-0.20 sec.), the support time is a crucial thing for neuro-muscular coordination. When the signal for the foot to touch the ground reaches the muscles and makes them prepare for landing, it's already too late. And cushioning here is the factor which deteriorates timing and as a consequence, running technique, by increasing the time of support and due to this, loading of joints, ligaments, tendons, and muscles.
Second, a thick sole and cushioning increase the possibility of pronation or supination, if the runner has a tendency to it. Hence, it leads to injuries, and we'll talk about this separately.
Third, in Pose Method landing occurs on the ball of the foot, not on the heel, so the thick shoe heel structure doesn't make any sense. Even more, it reduces the freedom of the heel, and ankle movement and decreases the calf muscle stretching elasticity effect.
2006-09-15 15:57:18 · answer #2 · answered by johnzy_08 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nike
2006-09-13 01:27:38 · answer #3 · answered by denise p 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nike
2006-09-12 22:09:45 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Adidas,i know alot of people wil ay nike bt i have had the NIKE Total 90 and Adidas F50 and trust me,the adidas gives alot of grip.so i say adidas
2006-09-12 13:14:10 · answer #5 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Right now I have the Nike Total 90 Supremacy FG and the Adidas Predator Absolute SG and both are good.
2006-09-12 11:37:21 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Generally, they're both close. In any kind of footwear. I'd go for Nike as easily as Adidas. Adidas ' retros. ' The good stuff.
2006-09-12 11:31:18 · answer #7 · answered by vanamont7 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the nike suprimes get more power but the adidas predators get a better touch on the ball both very good cleats i have tried them both
2006-09-12 11:41:02 · answer #8 · answered by mikejones 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
adidas,, germany won the 1954 world cup with the help of adi dassler. adidas is definitely made for football!
2006-09-12 22:50:21 · answer #9 · answered by ANDI앤디ANDI앤디ANDI앤디 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
nike has personalized cleats for the position you play. They have cleats for speed specifically, accuracy/power, and first touch/precision.
Zidane uses addidas
Ronaldinho uses nike
2006-09-12 11:33:46 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋