I have also got serious doubts about 9/11. If you look at the available evidence, and I say available, because the evidence that would answer a lot of questions is being withheld by the US Administration, it is obvious that the Pentagon was hit by a Missile. I would suggest it was done so the US could invade Afghanistan, and gain control of the drug trade. [drug production has increased 3 fold since the Yanks went in] and why Afghanistan, the SO called 19 hijackers were from Saudi Arabia. Also there is a possibility of building an oil pipeline through Afganistan from the oil rich Caspian Sea area. It has nothing to do with Iraq. Watch a DVD called LOOSE CHANGE 2. Find it for a nominal price on EBAY. In fact everybody should watch it.
2006-09-12 11:06:17
·
answer #1
·
answered by researcher 3
·
0⤊
3⤋
OK get yer tinfoil on .
1. You said 16 meter hole that's almost 50 ft , slam the nose of a plane into something at 500 mph and watch how fast the wings snap.
2 Laden with fuel , Wrong for a trans-Continental flight a B757 would need about 40-55 thousand pounds of fuel (6 to 8 thousand gallons)
Unless a plane is over water for a extended time most airline seldom fill the tanks to there capacity .
3 Airplanes burn a large percentage of there fuel on take off and the first few minutes of flight .
A rough estimate would be about 5 -6 thousand gallons on board
which BTW 23500 lbs would be in the wings (3400 gals give or take 5%)
4 Jet-A is kerosene while it burns good once its lit , its not explosive unless compressed
5 The only piece of wreckage found is the strongest item (The landing gear was found ) why is this over looked .
6 Quit reading Michael Moore, Mr Moores agenda is how can I make more money , seriously , Moore said Enron was a good investment and Kim Jong IL can be trusted both have been proving to be factually incorrect .
2006-09-12 11:16:27
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I'm not sure what to think but some things just don't add up! like you say the plane that hit the Pentagon I'm not sure the size of the wing span of the plane but the hole very tiny compared to what it should have been if hit by a large 747 or what ever model it was we all saw the horrific extent of the damage to the W.T.C. there are many questions unanswered and I'm sure it will remain that way, like you say there was no plane parts found at the pentagon, also you would expect a building like the pentagon would have state of the art security surveillance systems and more than 1 camera filming the whole east or west wing which ever it was!! another interesting fact was the side of the pentagon that was hit was being refurbished at the time!!!! was that just luck? good planning or bad planning?? Guess that depends on who did it. There is shed loads of info. on the Internet and alot of the times and communications about the pentagon plane etc.. again don't add up.
I feel for anybody who lost friends family or colleges in 9/11 and will never forget that day. But I am open minded enough that I don't always believe what I'm told especially by governments, politicians and presidents!
I was going to say I'm amazed at some of the responses but on reflection I'm not at all.
2006-09-12 11:23:36
·
answer #3
·
answered by WiLLow 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Good to read the question.
You are obviously one of the thousands of Americans who are beginning to question the government's story.
The latest poll shown just yesterday showed that 45% of Americans now believe that the Government was complicit in 9/11.
I'm pleased you have started your research, and I'm not going to say too much, except to provide a little help.
I have been researching this hard for five years, and must have read several thousand articles, seen hundreds of videos, and visited hundreds of web sites, and my mind is now quite clear.
I would suggest a look at the sites below, which will help you on your way.
2006-09-12 12:51:13
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
There is a big question mark over it all.
The truth of the matter, whatever that may be, would now cause uproar and panic, who would believe anything they tell us now ?
To deviate from the official report would cast great doubt over anything the government or media tells us. There is not one person I know, even my aged mother, who believes the official story, but, as for the truth, we shall never know.
My old history teacher used to say, if you want to know the true perpetrators of any act, follow the money.
I must admit that my first political thoughts about the tragedy were of `the burning of the Reichstag` one only has to look at the world since that day to see who has gained power and wealth from it.
Bear, dear boy have a thought for other peoples intelligence, rather than blindly following the leader some of us do try to think for ourselves. A few manners would not go amiss too.
2006-09-12 11:13:43
·
answer #5
·
answered by Robert Abuse 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
the plane wouldn't have been ladened with fuel as an internal flight doesn't require a full tank. Why do Americans always think life is like it is in the movies?
2006-09-12 10:53:24
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
earlier than 1945 it replaced into the two by being attacked, or seen "interior the national pastime." Now? particularly with the aid of fact we desperate to provide up hiding at the back of 2 oceans and strengthen into extra in touch. on account that important wars appeared to land up and contain us besides. the belief replaced into to nip issues interior the bud. till now they unfold to our shorelines. additionally to keep away from yet another aggressor us of a from becoming up. consisting of Nazi Germany replaced into. To help our allies in NATO and SEATO and to keep away from the unfold of Soviet and chinese language Communism. Many call our coverage being the international's Policeman.Which has led us into helping governments we in line with danger do not have.All in an attempt to maintain the international Peace and stop motives we concept have been communist sponsored. in spite of the fact that, we frequently did no longer back an best buddy, frequently sufficient, in time of want. The Shah of Iran could be one. We nevertheless pay for that mistake immediately. an identical with no longer backing our WW2 best buddy Chiang Kai Shek's government in China. There, we lost the prospect to work out yet another stable democratic republic upward push from the ashes of war. immediately, we rather are paying dearly for that one. you could hint our failure in China, and the eastern ecu Block, to lots of our protection stress and foreign places coverage judgements considering that.
2016-11-07 04:50:20
·
answer #7
·
answered by ravelo 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
i don't believe in a conspiracy of 911. the whole situation doesn't make sense. too many holes in that argument. but Richard Clarke and bob Woodward's book "plan of attack" said the bush administration wanting to go to war with Iraq from the beginning of his presidency.
2006-09-12 10:51:04
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
Gettin' Old
2 points
2006-09-12 10:48:08
·
answer #9
·
answered by SVern 3
·
3⤊
1⤋
if you can go to www.loosechange911.com and then make your own mind up..... there are many questions and the american govement does not answer them, when really they should.. there is something that does not add up about the 9/11 day....... im in england and everyone here has questioned it from the day it happened,,
2006-09-12 10:51:22
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋