ANSWER: No- the hydrocarbon fire burned about 1000 degrees less than what what needed to weaken the steel.
2006-09-12 10:43:40 · 6 answers · asked by mikeygonebad 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
You should have placed a bottle of liquid oxygen beside the jet fuel and lit it from 500m away. That would have been epic.
2006-09-12 10:47:48 · answer #1 · answered by theoneandonlyhaz 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Thats a pretty pathetic attempt. The attack was Al Queida and Muslum Extemeists only- this other garbage is just subterfuge.
2006-09-12 10:49:38 · answer #2 · answered by bmwdriver11 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
http://www.debunking911.com/index.html
if you want the truth you will look here , after 5 years i assume you don't want to know the truth though
2006-09-12 11:02:09 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Oh yea, that is a scientific!!! Get a life of any kind.
2006-09-12 10:48:47 · answer #4 · answered by Wolfpacker 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Try again, or tell all the experts that contradict you that they are wrong.
2006-09-12 10:47:04 · answer #5 · answered by L3-knightw1zard 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
why dont you find osama ben alden and burn him
2006-09-12 12:10:42 · answer #6 · answered by martywdx 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋