Not even close. When America wanted to break free from the British, they fought in a war. The British came here and got ran out. Americans wrote up a constitution, by the founding fathers.
The country was united under this effort.
Saudi's has nothing to do with Iraq. The USA has taken away their form of government in Iraq and established their form of government. Then they said this is good for you. Now you can vote. But one dictator is about like all the others. So they really don't know who the worst guy for the job is. Then the other side says why can't we come up with our own form of government?
So, some say the USA has a good idea and they are here and they are powerful and fighting and your not going to get rid of them any time soon, so let's just go along with them.
The other side says, No, who are they to tell us what to do?
this is our country? Now similar to Timothy McVay, there is radical extremists who hate anything western and want to blow us up. In an effort to protect ourselves from these people USA takes over. This is createing a situation of civil war.
Which is pretty much what the extremists want.
It is a no win situation. It is like going to Arizona and blowing it up because Timothy McVey came from there.
Most people in that country don't have a clue what they are fighting about. They have computers and ask us.
It is a lack of communication and bad policy.
2006-09-12 10:40:32
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
- they have been the two began because of the fact they have been consistently paying taxes to the king(American- whomever the united kingdom's king lower back then and French- Louis XVl) - the human beings who have been paying each and all the taxes gained *word*- the american Revolution stimulated the French Revolution....they theory that considering the fact that they gained, they'd do a similar
2016-12-12 07:19:02
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes... I do see a similarity.
One glaring difference. The American revolution was about freedom for "the people"
Islamic extremists which are the most vocal representative of Islam, wants to tell YOU and ME what everyone can and cannot do. They want to subjugate the entire world under Sharia law.
2006-09-12 10:28:45
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Both revolutions are supported by wealthy politicians who had the most to gain from war.
2006-09-12 10:28:04
·
answer #4
·
answered by Scooter 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
There is at least one similarity.....the British of the time were calling us terrorists, insergents, criminals, theives and militants.
Awfully funny how watered down the word "terrorist" has become.
2006-09-12 10:42:11
·
answer #5
·
answered by trevor22in 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Perhaps.
2006-09-12 10:28:02
·
answer #6
·
answered by Pez 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
It is nothing of the kind.
2006-09-12 10:27:48
·
answer #7
·
answered by vanamont7 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
nada
2006-09-12 10:28:11
·
answer #8
·
answered by Fulf 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
No.
2006-09-12 10:28:04
·
answer #9
·
answered by newt_peabody 5
·
0⤊
0⤋