I am so sick of dealing with this terrorist country. To keep a long story short, I think America should just handle the situation like this - Tell Iran to go ahead with its "peacful" Nuclear program... Then make it clear to them, that they will be spied on 24/7 by American satelites, airplanes, and spies within the country. Tell them that we are repositioning hundreds of H-bombs at them, for our own security. After that is made clear, tell them that if "we see or find out you have a bomb or are even working on it (and have difinitive proof of it).....We will NUKE YOU OFF THE FACE OF THE PLANET"....there will be no warning...no.."you have 48 hours to evacuate"...just hundreds of nuclear bombs falling on your country"..... end transmition...
This may sound drastic, but we cannot afford to let them have a nuclear bomb, which will surley be sold to the highest bidder...
2006-09-12 10:08:40 · 12 answers · asked by quarterback 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
You are a sad little person. If you seriously think America has the right to A.spy on another sovereign country at will and B.blow that country up for making a nuclear weapon, you need help.
America is not the police of the world, We are the head of the UN we dont even pay our god damn UN dues, so we should stop trying to control this world. Why exactly cant we let them afford to have a nuclear bomb yet its okay for pakistan, india and israel to have it? Are they somehow more stable than iran? Or do you believe the lies about iran the media is perpetuating? Thinking like this is the worlds problem with america, we dont control everything get it? I am just sickened that people like this exist in my country.
2006-09-12 10:13:04 · answer #1 · answered by stephaniemariewalksonwater 5 · 0⤊ 3⤋
First of all Iran is NOT a terrorist country...Iran is negotiating right now with the EU and they said that they might suspend the enrichment of Uranium...This without any threats like the ones that Bush made...So,they will go along with the nuclear problem anyway...
And it would be the most stupid thing ever to attack Iran...Especially now that they are talking about stopping the enrichment of Uranium...If they agree I really don't think there will be a reason for US to attack it...But,of course they haven't had one for Iraq either...
2006-09-12 20:08:41 · answer #2 · answered by Tinkerbell05 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
they have many times and for the previous 4-5 years completed it and what has been the reaction to that? offering beneficiant programs to them and saying that there would desire to nevertheless be negotiations. I strongly have confidence that aside from the U. S. the entire Europe, China, and Russia extremely would extremely choose to make certain Iran has the nukes. They make an extremely sturdy money out of their contracts with Iran and be attentive to that as quickly as they get nukes US can not do something with Iran. unluckily! Mullahs shouls be attacked via the U. S. very right now!
2016-09-30 21:26:46 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Are you serious? YOUR DEALING WITH THEM?
Let me ask a question...when was the last time the United States was inspected by United Nations weapons inspectors? Who is the only country in the history of this planet to use nuclear weapons DURING A WAR ON AN ENEMY?
People like you make me sick. You promote death and destruction.
And by the way...if you think the United States doesn't spy on other countries illegally you should think again. They do it to their own citizens. What makes you think they won't do it to someone else?
2006-09-12 10:14:25 · answer #4 · answered by trevor22in 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Israel will take care of them. Thats the only reason Bush hasn't.
Cheney was just on Meet the Press talking about Iraq being a sponsor of terrorism. I don't even recall him saying anything about Iran. Maybe he doesn't talk about it because the plans are already in the drawer.
2006-09-12 10:19:15 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
then two days after the attack we will all be dead,
and then we can start it all over again, but will there be two men or two women or will God go back to one of each?
after all if it were any of the other choices other than the man and women we would never have to worry about a bomb again.
2006-09-12 10:19:02 · answer #6 · answered by t-bone 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Then the US will decide whether it is going to preemptively attack another country or not. The US is making up (or breaking) the rules as it goes along.
So, given that the US has established itself as the world empire and neighborhood bully, and has unilaterally demanded other countries comply with its demands, it can do whatever it wants until enough other countries get annoyed and try to stop it.
2006-09-12 10:11:19 · answer #7 · answered by coragryph 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
So, you want to solve violence with violence...that is pretty mature (sarcasm). The only way the human race can continue to live on this planet is by peace...fight war, not wars.
2006-09-12 10:15:27 · answer #8 · answered by IMP 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well you summed it all up in your statement.. Allthough I dont see giving them 48 hours 48 minutes maybe
2006-09-12 10:17:36 · answer #9 · answered by Bill G 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
IF the US did that I'm sure that would start world war 3 and it will NOT be pretty.
2006-09-12 10:15:24 · answer #10 · answered by Guywiththehir 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋