English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Let me know your thoughts!

2006-09-12 09:44:14 · 34 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music Television

Wow ! I never thought everyone so many people would be against the licence.

I'm going to start a Blog Under the name Lost in lost

If you have any further comments on the tv licence Please let me know .

2006-09-12 23:02:32 · update #1

34 answers

Absolutely. There should be no taxes on information.

2006-09-12 09:54:09 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

yes it should be abolished. we shouldn't be paying it at all. in fact, the government were stupid to create and introduce it the first place. considering how much it costs, we expect better programmes in return for our money, sadly however the dross that is on our tv screens goes to show the money that has been gathered up has been wasted on such drivel and crappy programmes that we don't want and of which we had never asked for in the first place! and its too bloody expensive as well, the elderly folks to name can hardly afford it themselves.

the tv licence is a total con and a complete rip off. its not as if we came up with the ideas for most of those s***** shows anyway, so why on earth should we be accountable for paying it?

2006-09-12 09:58:06 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

YES it's a con and the way they throw the licence fee money around makes me despair. It was a good idea when it started out keeping it independent of politics but the concept is now out of date and the beeb is sucking up to the politicians.

2006-09-12 10:03:48 · answer #3 · answered by bo nidle 4 · 1 0

Definitely! Considering I can get BBC through SKY and am paying 40 odd quid for that, it seems very unfair as am theoretically paying twice. I never watch any of the BBC channels anyway, nothing really interests me on them and there are far better other channels on SKY to watch! I would rather BBC just introduced adverts to subsidise themselves.

2006-09-12 09:54:16 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

I hardly ever watch the BBC channels and resent paying so much on a tv licence.

2006-09-12 09:51:08 · answer #5 · answered by jumpingjellybean 2 · 1 0

Absolutely.

Considering that most people are paying a subscription to sky tv and analogue tv is ending soon... Also the 5 analogue channels don't have much to watch anyway!

2006-09-12 09:59:45 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Yes

2006-09-12 09:49:55 · answer #7 · answered by Bob The Builder 5 · 1 0

Yes of course it should how much money do they charge us and most of us watch Sky or Cable which does not come from the Beeb

2006-09-12 16:21:38 · answer #8 · answered by gabby 2 · 0 0

Definitely when the digital take over happens, as everyone will have to pay for Sky anyway.

2006-09-12 14:14:39 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Definintely. There's nothing but shite on tv and what's more we have over 400 channels of shite instead of the original 4.

2006-09-12 09:54:09 · answer #10 · answered by poppies say grrr! 3 · 1 0

Yes it should!And the person that came up with the idea of us having to pay it should be hung,drawn and quartered...on live tv :oD

2006-09-12 09:46:39 · answer #11 · answered by twinkle 3 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers