Do you STILL trust President Bush as being an ethical President after reading this information?

Question

Here is a news release from Senator Carl Levin (Democrat Michigan) stating that the intelligence given related to the link between Saddam Hussein and al-queda was faulty.

http://www.carllevin.com/news/2006/09/08/levin-floor-speech-on-the-senate-intelligence-committees-phase-ii-report/

Do you still trust your President to be honest and ethical or is he tunnel visioned to ignore factual evidence?

And you thought a blue dress and a cigar was worthy of impeachment?

Just so you know, don't blame me for him being in office 'cause I didn't vote for him either!

Mulascone, the economy in Michigan is EXCELLENT?????? If you believe that lie, then you are very sadly misinformed. Oh yes, we love our 7% unemployment rate (and that's based only on those who are collecting unemployment).

Answer 1

it is just amazing to see the people of the most powerful nartion on Earth being fooled by a bunch of neocons. They have been lying all along, and the biggest lie is about 9/11
I just saw the documentary, "Loose change 2nd Edition", it is a real eye opener. You can also visit the site
http://www.loosechange911.com/index_main.html

Answer 2

Is Clinton honest? President Clinton in 1998:

"Just consider the facts. Iraq repeatedly made false declarations about the weapons that it had left in its possession after the Gulf War. When UNSCOM would then uncover evidence that gave the lie to those declarations, Iraq would simply amend the reports. For example, Iraq revised its nuclear declarations four times within just 14 months and it has submitted six different biological warfare declarations, each of which has been rejected by UNSCOM. In 1995, Hussein Kamal, Saddam's son-in-law, and chief organizer of Iraq's weapons-of-mass-destruction program, defected to Jordan. He revealed that Iraq was continuing to conceal weapons and missiles and the capacity to build many more. Then and only then did Iraq admit to developing numbers of weapons in significant quantities and weapon stocks. Previously, it had vehemently denied the very thing it just simply admitted once Saddam Hussein's son-in-law defected to Jordan and told the truth."

"Now listen to this: What did it admit? It admitted, among other things, an offensive biological warfare capability--notably 5,000 gallons of botulinum, which causes botulism; 2,000 gallons of anthrax; 25 biological-filled Scud warheads; and 157 aerial bombs. And might I say, UNSCOM inspectors believe that Iraq has actually greatly understated its production."

"Next, throughout this entire process, Iraqi agents have undermined and undercut UNSCOM. They've harassed the inspectors, lied to them, disabled monitoring cameras, literally spirited evidence out of the back doors of suspect facilities as inspectors walked through the front door. And our people were there observing it and had the pictures to prove it."

"We have to defend our future from these predators of the 21st century. They will be all the more lethal if we allow them to build arsenals of nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons and the missiles to deliver them. We simply cannot allow that to happen. There is no more clear example of this threat than Saddam Hussein."

Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm...

Answer 3

With all due respect, you ignorant people get on my nerves with your lame brained questions. Okay, first off, Levin sits on The SSIC. He sees the Intel, the same Intel the president does. His committee looks it over, study it, discuss it, and advise the president. The Democrats remind me of kids that have gotten caught smoking in the bathroom, "Oh it wasn't my fault, they were his cigs..." Give me a break here!

"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and th! e means of delivering them."
- Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002

Answer 4

I have a question for you:

"Have you ever trusted this president?" If so, i commend you for waking up and think on your own. If not (and i wouldn't be surprised), it is yet another nail into his political coffin.

Bush as president never existed. He was a joke from the beginning and was laughed at the world over. I travel a lot internationally and get to hear many opinions about our regime. I cannot recall to have heard ever a better opinion than: "At least they haven't used nuclear weapons yet." This of course is a pretty sorry picture of puppetdent Bush and his junta.

Answer 5

Does anyone believe Carl Levin?
Evidently, you didn't know that Democrats on the Intelligence Committee had the same information as Bush.
They came to the same conclusion as Bush.
You are either un-informed or lying.

Answer 6

Carl is the liar here, The report says nothing to support his conclusions. no evidence means no evidence ie inconclusive. The president leaned one way Carl the other. history will tell who was right. It is a big jump from can't prove a connection to there is no connection

Answer 7

no,, never have,, when what you believe is less important than belief itself,,,, the soul of the church should not include Christian sectarian motivations,, America was not built on theology,, but by those trying to escape theologies,, Bush has a religious imagination based on years of traditions, crusades, and mythology,, which is OK,, but should not be inserted into his military doctrine,,,, those who died on 9-11 were of over 100 different faiths,,,, who in total represent the basic values of a nation of laws and justice,,,
to assert that US troops can not stand down until the Iraqi troops stand up,, when in truth,, some Iraqi troops are killing the very US soldiers who train them, or running away before the suicidal martyrs approach,,
to attempt to make us believe that US troops can not leave the battlefield in Iraq to come home,,, or a terrorist will follow them,,, as the unequivocal success to terror.... is ambiguous at best....
yes there are those who want to kill us,, but to suggest that they have all scrambled to Iraq to blow each other up is,,, not a rational strategy,,,
are we to believe that the #1 terrorist leader of the world,, Osama bin laden ,, responsible for the sophisticated attacks on our soil would finance and train the Taliban and send al Qaeda terrorists to the quagmire in Baghdad.........

Answer 8

If you think Bush cared about any terrorist in Iraq, or the "innocent" Iraqi citizens.....you are wrong.

War makes for good business, especially when you give "nopbid" contracts to companies like Cheney's Halliburton and the joint venture "Carlyle Group" (which is a joint venture between George Bush and the Bin Laden Group, Inc. ).


The war will be over when Bush and his personal friends have made their billions.

Answer 9

I didn't like before he became president. How many people knew he was a recovering alcoholic/drug addict? If you had listened to him prior to the elections, you'd have known better. No one did, hence the mess we're in now. The scary thing is that he was elected a second term! Unfortunately the man appealed to the other idiots who think greed is good and war is power. Lets hope we've learned our lesson boys and girls.

Answer 10

I never viewed Bush as an ethical anything. Someone who believes that wisdom lies in trying to bring peace, by fighting war with war is nothing more than a miniscule grain of knowledge among boulders of true wisdom.