2006-09-12 08:52:26 · 26 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
WHAT AN IDIOTIC THING TO SAY.I DON'T LIKE THE BUSH PRESIDENCY TO SAVE MY LIFE.BUT YOUR KIND OF STATEMENT MAKES GENUINE OPPOSITION LOOK STUPID.GO BACK TO SCHOOL THIS IS NOT A THEORY
2006-09-12 09:00:57 · answer #1 · answered by miraclehand2020 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
bad theory and a busted one many times, agreed the prez failed to live up to expectations just after 9/11 but that does mean he is responsible for it! They made some awful mistakes b4 9/11 but they are intelligence and human failiure at various levels.
Global warming is contributed by everyone in the world who uses fossil fuels for any purpose, so that should categorize the whole world lets not just blame one president for this... its a collective failiure of many heads of govts.
Manipulating Oil prices ...... hmmmmm this is a theory to be thought about but what the president gains from this should be a good guess 'cos making millions of people mad by up-ping the gas prices does not help anyone and least of all inflation!
2006-09-12 09:08:53 · answer #2 · answered by imhm2004 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Thats just it...jsut a theory, and not even based on reality.
911 - caused by terroristed and ignored by Clinton.
Global Warming - doesnt exist and even so is a 30+ yr old issue.
Oil Prices - FDR is the only president in history (maybe Nixon on price controls or Lincoln during Civilwar) to have the power to affect oil prices.
Today only the middle east can manipulate prices like u think.
Our president would have to be in control litterally of more than half the planet to affect prices at that level.
2006-09-12 09:08:25 · answer #3 · answered by pcreamer2000 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No. I think it is very simplistic. It too easy to use Bush as a scapegoat and blame him for all the ills of the world I guess. The trade center was attacked once before the 911 attack and Bin Laden was connected to that attack and unfortunately for some reason the previous administration did not have him brought to justice when they could have. No logistically, scientifically, and politically President Bush was not responsible for this horrific attack on the United States and its people. As for the oil prices you can trace that to the middle east too if you do a little more research on the subject. Happy researching.
2006-09-12 09:06:53 · answer #4 · answered by aili 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Hey Driver! I like you but hate your theory. You know me and my knoweldge of the energy industry so I won't go into that, but Bush is the only GOP president to ever admit to Global warming. HE just wouldn't sign the Kyoto pact since it didn't hold two thirds of the world's population accountable. This would have made it cheaper yet to do business in these countries and cost more US jobs He said he would sign a pact that was globally inclusive.
9/11 I just don't get it.
2006-09-12 09:00:19 · answer #5 · answered by mymadsky 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think that your theory is good, yet incorrect. It good because you wrote it cleanly and with no hint of being vulgar. I applaud you on that. However, bush is doing a great job. Has there been another attack? No. Is he the cause of global warming..no. All of us attribute to that one. Both me an you and everyone else in this room cause global warming each day...as for the oil prices..I hope not..that one I'm not sure of, but I trust our president. He knows what hes doing.
2006-09-12 14:15:15 · answer #6 · answered by Angel of Man 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
you forgot to give an explanation , for example - bush and ladin are the same person and just have morphing abilities , to explain the oil thing just state he is from texas because everybody knows if you are from texas you are an oil tycoon automatically , and for the global warming he must have purchased stock in an electricity company , then sent nasa to strip the ozone layer thus all electricity bills going up . if you do this micheal moore will be very proud of you
2006-09-12 09:08:01 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think Bush is responsible for a poor reaction to 9/11, not trying to reduce global warming, and ignoring the manipulation of the price of oil.
2006-09-12 08:56:11 · answer #8 · answered by DougDoug_ 6 · 2⤊ 4⤋
As President of the United States Bush has certain responsibilities and took an oath of office. He was warned that Osama bin Laden was about to attack us on our own soil. He ignored the warnings and the biggest security lapse in the history of the US occurred on his watch. While not responsible for the attacks, as Commander in Chief he is responsible for not preventing them.
Bush has ignored the Kyoto accords on global warming. He is in denial about its existence.
He is responsible for doing nothing about global warming.
Cheney met in secret sessions with leaders of Enron and the oil companies to set America's energy policy. Since they met in secret so it is impossible to say how much they are responsible for manipulating the price of oil.
2006-09-12 09:10:45 · answer #9 · answered by wyldfyr 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
What theory.It's too spread out to say there are only 2 opinions.
Bush is not "responsible" for 9-11.He did however,attack an unrelated country as he admitted.
Global warming is related to pollution.
2006-09-12 09:18:19 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋