SlNCE BUSH TOTALLY IGNORES THE CONSTITUTION ON A DAILY BASIS, SHOULD BILL CLINTON RUN FOR PRESIDENT?

Question

SINCE NOW IT'S OK SINCE BUSH SET THE PRECEDENT THAT THE CONSTITUTION IS "JUST A G*D D**NED PIECE OF PAPER!!"

I KNOW THE LIMIT IS 2 TERMS, BUT SINCE BUSH DECLARED THE CONSITUTION SIMPLY A PIECE OF PAPER, CLINTON SHOULD RUN.

BUSH IS A DRUNKEN MONKEY!!

Answer 1

Just because one person breaks the law doesn't mean everyone else gets to break it as well. That's the same type of irrational argument that many Bush supporters use.

Answer 2

One thing I have learned from reading all the Liberal garbage that is on this site, is y'all brains refuse to function .... This is from Capitolhillblue retraction of the "piece of paper story)
Three sources told Doug Thompson from The Capitol Blue that they heard Bush say this. Two of those sources were not even present at the meeting and the third source now refuses to confirm or deny.. AS for tinkering with the Constitution, members of congress have proposed 11,000 amendments over the last decade.

So give me a couple of examples of Bush ignoring the Constitution on "a daily basis"... Or don't you know what you're talking about on that accusation either!!!?

Answer 3

First - the reporter who initially claimed Bush stated the Constitution was a gd piece of paper has effectively recanted the story.

Second - I think Hillary would have something to say if there was some was for Bill to run again.

Answer 4

Osama Bush--that's sooo clever. The only ones who think Bush is violating the constitution are you liberals. The rest of us realize he's trying to prevent another 9/11. Too bad you don't think he can do both. Sure, let Bill run. He's violated the law numerous times. Why should a little thing like the constitution stop him? Besides it makes total sense to me that you complain that Bush is doing a bad thing, so to fix that you suggest that Clinton do the same thing.

Answer 5

Obviously u cant read or even think straight.

1st off, two terms is constitutional.
2nd - Clinton is the one who most set the precedent of violating the constitution (next to Nixon & FDR).

Nixon - per watergate.
FDR - per his consideration of eliminating the constitution, but to his credit decided against becoming dictator.

Btw, that is fact based on his own writings of his first days in office when he was seriously looking at the possibility of doing away with the constitution.

Its democrats who eventoday are trying to bypass the constition the most. (not to say that Bush is not doing either)..
Just pointing out that democrats have done it as often if not worse.

Answer 6

Only two minor problems with your question.

1. Bush doesn't ignore the Constitution
2. Term limits prevent Bill from running again

Answer 7

Just because Bush wipes his as$ with the Constitution, that's not how the rest of us choose to use it.

Thee two term limit stands. But Hillary can do a lot of good in 8 years in office. She'll be able to get a lot of input from Bill, so it should be a very successful, prosperous 8 years.

Answer 8

No. Simply on principle, no.

Just because the current administration tramples all over the Constitution doesn't mean the Democrats should as well. There should be at least one political party that can represent those who respect the rule of (Constitutional) law.

Answer 9

The limit is two consecutive terms. Bill Clinton can legally run for a third term in 2008.

Answer 10

Bill Clinton sucked as a President, or was it that Bill Clinton was to busy being sucked while President to do a good job. I say bring on Hillary! She did a GREAT job running our country all 8 years he was in office!