If we are to regard surface as its own sort of substance, that possesses value, what are the subsequent implications for our concept of "value" in such a world?
2006-09-12 08:09:41 · 6 answers · asked by infiniti1113 3 in Education & Reference ➔ Words & Wordplay
It has no implications... its such an odd question.
As a mathematician i automatically assume that 'value' is defined by the system and has no real meaning outside anyways.
However there is no such thing as 'surface' in the physical sense regardless of whether you would like to make it declared one.
2006-09-12 08:19:49 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Are values in the world essentially based on superficiality and possession? :-)
2006-09-12 09:16:20 · answer #2 · answered by Shona L 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I like what volterwd said.
2006-09-12 08:38:03 · answer #3 · answered by wonderwoman 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Dude, stop using all those big words.
2006-09-12 08:16:39 · answer #4 · answered by ? 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, that is correct!
2006-09-12 09:44:26 · answer #5 · answered by ravin_lunatic 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
sorry..i have no clue...sorrry!
what subject is this for anyways?
2006-09-12 08:16:20 · answer #6 · answered by Lina 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋