Given that a Republican-led company (Diebold) provides the government with the voting machines, their chairman (a party member) dismisses any problems with the security of these machines, non-partisan computer experts all agree that there is a potential security problem with these machines, there is no paper trail to ensure no tampering has taken place, no recounts are possible, there is currently no legislation requiring secure voting systems, and there were hints of tampering allegations during the last presidential election...
How can we trust that our votes are being counted without stringent laws governing the use of electronic machines? Shouldn't the firewalls for these machines be tighter than NORADs??
Where is the public outcry? What is the media's responsibility in this case?
2006-09-12
06:42:33
·
9 answers
·
asked by
jimvalentinojr
6
in
Politics & Government
➔ Other - Politics & Government
http://www.commondreams.org/headlines03/0828-08.htm
2006-09-12
06:47:42 ·
update #1
http://csdl2.computer.org/persagen/DLAbsToc.jsp?resourcePath=/dl/mags/sp/&toc=comp/mags/sp/2004/01/j1toc.xml&DOI=10.1109/MSECP.2004.1264851
2006-09-12
06:49:04 ·
update #2
http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/freeabs_all.jsp?arnumber=1301313
2006-09-12
06:50:11 ·
update #3