When he was only in office for 8 months? Obviously an attack of that magnitude took longer than 8 months to plan and prepare for. I don't understand this
2006-09-12 05:47:32 · 16 answers · asked by Firefly 4 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
To put this simply liberals cannot believe that they are not in power. They are sure that is they were in power they could talk the terrorists out of attacking us. Bill Clinton had numerous opportunities to get Bin Laden and didn't take them. His terrorist response was to put missiles into as aspirin factory. Lot of good that did. The terrorists hope the democrats win in 06 and 08 because they know we will be left without any protection. The total liberal thing is if anything happens it is Bush's fault and they had absolutely nothing to do with it. Do not believe them. They will deceive you. VOTE REPUBLICAN
2006-09-12 07:48:05 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
When liberals can't win elections on the issues , they get panicky . It is impossible for them to ever admit that Clinton was a buffoon in office ; and had he done his job , many things would have been different . After all , terrorists tried to take down the WTC first on Clinton's watch . With all the planning to pull off the terrorist attacks on 9/11-doesn't that tell you , that it would have happened as scheduled no matter who had won the election ?
It is not something the Bush Administration dreamed up . They are out to destroy our way of life -plain & simple . No president is perfect . They are not God . But a president who acts in the right direction for the right reasons , accomplishing more in his first year in office that Clinton did in two terms -is going to be trashed at every turn by those who know he is making their party look inferior . Thus-they are out to get him at all costs-whether it means taking the side of the enemy -or devaluing our beliefs ; demoralizing our troops ; to fabricating news and ridiculous conspiracies . Nothing is sacred . No-one is scared. The country is not scared . The pure hatred that permeats society , mainly initiated by disgruntled liberals ; catching onto anyone who loves spreading this hate , is evident . It has divided the democrat party . It has appeased our enemies ; and it threatens to deter President Bush from protecting our nation . Thank God he is above all this nonsense .
2006-09-12 07:36:04 · answer #2 · answered by missmayzie 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Because those same people that blame Bush suffer from a lack of intelligence themselves. The planning and staging of 9/11 took many years.
2006-09-12 05:53:22 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 0⤋
McCain has an prolonged, and that i recommend long, history of attacking his fellow Republicans and sucking as much as Democrats. Why do you think of the Democrats and the biased media went to such lengths to get him the nomination? Heck, McCain grew to become into heavily going to alter events to run as Kerry's vice chairman. You and McCain are ineffective incorrect to in user-friendly terms blame the Katrina fiasco on the President. the 1st line of protection in a typhoon is the Mayor who failed thoroughly in New Orleans. remember all those unused college buses that ended up getting flooded? the 2nd is the Governor who ought to no longer even get it collectively adequate to formally request Federal counsel. no remember the variety you seem at it, in any disaster, FEMA isn't and could't be a well-known responder. they must save their human beings and ingredients out of the disaster section till the hurricane is over or possibility dropping them, too. Then, whilst the hurricane subsides, they must get by way of flooded streets, collapsed bridges, debris closed roads and so on. the comparable hurricane hit and the comparable FEMA replied to different Southern States hit no longer user-friendly during Katrina. They fared much extra effective because of the fact their community Mayors and the State Governors did no longer basically take a seat their on an identical time as the hurricane approached for weeks and not take action. Do I blame President Bush, there grew to become into plenty to take difficulty with on the subject of the undesirable overall performance of FEMA yet on the different hand, yet another company decrease than Bush's administration did an spectacular interest, the USA Coast look after! yet with regard to movements that could have stored much extra lives I place the Mayor of recent Orleans on the desirable of the record and the Governor of Louisiana an in depth 2nd. McCain is now and continuously has been a self-serving fool. If the Democrats had nominated a halfway respectable candidate like Richardson they could win particularly in November. think of if the super Delegates ever determine that out. *
2016-12-18 09:04:13 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I dont understand it either. I guess because for some reason a lot of people hate the man and blame him for all the problems in the world. Its such a narrow way of thinking... and sad.
I mean, look at some of the answers your getting. Its quite remarkable how people think (or dont think)
2006-09-12 05:53:58 · answer #5 · answered by J D 5 · 5⤊ 0⤋
THANK YOU -- you are so correct. It's because liberals just want to bash Bush -- they don't understand that thousands of intelligence tips have to be sorted thru every day. Liberals are unable to admit that Bush is actually a hero who is saving our country--and the world--from Islamo-fascism.
2006-09-12 05:54:20 · answer #6 · answered by t_o_w_e_r_i_n_g 3 · 5⤊ 0⤋
The media. Also if people (idiots) think that any Pres would plan something like this they are OUT OF THERE MIND.Dont listen to them they have no idea what they are talkin about.
2006-09-12 05:53:59 · answer #7 · answered by bill s 2 · 4⤊ 0⤋
He was the person that was asleep at the wheel. It happened on his watch. He received the intelligence that attacks were being planned and what they planned to use (airplanes), they didn't give him a date or time therefore he discarded the info as being "not reliable". As for him only being on the job for 8 months, Who gets to have 4 weeks of vacation after only working 8 months? Maybe he was focused on his brush clearing in Crawford!
2006-09-12 05:56:12 · answer #8 · answered by drezach 1 · 0⤊ 6⤋
Because they are liberial Clinton lovers who don't want to blame Clinton even though he is the real cause.
2006-09-12 05:52:51 · answer #9 · answered by N3WJL 5 · 5⤊ 1⤋
Because he had numerous reports of the terror plot and chose to ignore them in order to justify his evil war for oil and scare Americans into giving up their civil liberties.
2006-09-12 05:53:27 · answer #10 · answered by Mark 5 · 1⤊ 5⤋