a blind man, an iraqi who lost his eyes, followed instructions from his passenger...left..right...straight on..etc, crashed the car travelling at 30 mph and was shown leniency by the judge. What I dont understand is the banning of just 3 years, does that mean after that he can start driving again??! Does the DVLA have a blind clause or what lol!
2006-09-12 05:42:56 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Current Events
and why wont yahoo print the word that is the opposite of bent!
2006-09-12 05:43:30 · update #1
lol freedomh..! i tried and tried to write straight but it kept coming out in dots!
2006-09-12 23:51:06 · update #2
No the sentence was for his careless driving and no licence and uninsured
the judge gave him the maximum penalty, for this infringement of the road traffic act.
. in order to drive again after the three years is up
he would have, to get a driving licence that would include a SIGHT test! as standard .
as the man is totally blind, he will not get a driving licence .!!!
If he were to attempt to drive, ( even with a co-driver)
he would receive a prison sentence and again have no chance to re offend again .
as he has NO licence
>^,,^<
( the blind man, could also speak no English, and was an immigrant of foreign extraction ) as was his co-"driver".
2006-09-12 06:06:36 · answer #1 · answered by sweet-cookie 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Well it would seem so! I hope not because he's a hazard to all and sundry including himself as for DVLA ... By the time they actually put two and tow together ... The man will probably swapping his car licence for an arctic!!! They're that slow ...
2006-09-12 05:54:14 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
its probably incase he magically gets his sight back, its like when under 17's commit an offence they get a few years ban, but that does not start untill they are able to drive, then they are banned for the amopunt of time givin in the ban.but as for this guy, i think he should have spent a while in jail and the guy giving him directions, he should get the ban!
2006-09-12 05:54:19 · answer #3 · answered by baz 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
We tend to think of dog training as a series of steps for teaching particular behaviors. To teach a dog to stay in a particular position, you reward her as she remains in place for gradually longer times, at gradually greater distances, with gradually increasing degrees of distraction. Read more https://tr.im/ompaT
Now, this is fine, training does involve teaching dogs specific behaviors with a step-by-step approach. This week, though, I’m going to discuss three mental habits that will not only enable you train more effectively but also make life pleasant for both you and your dog.
2016-04-25 23:18:27 · answer #4 · answered by shawna 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Woof Woof
2006-09-12 08:09:28 · answer #5 · answered by AndyPandy 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the law must work within its own guidelines if it is written that the maximum penalty is 3 years then the court cannot impose longer . This limits the damage personal prejudice can cause .
2006-09-12 05:50:48 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
i don't think the courts are barking i only think dogs do that lol ok sorry not helping ye it does seem strange he only got 3 yrs wonder what he would have got for killing someone
2006-09-12 05:57:48 · answer #7 · answered by old_rocker2001 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yeah I read that too, he also only had two fingers on his right hand!
It's insane, I'd at least send him to therapy.
2006-09-12 05:58:01 · answer #8 · answered by VernHead123 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
This is why drive-up ATMs have Braille on them.
And what is wrong with straight?
2006-09-12 14:46:47 · answer #9 · answered by Kokopelli 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Surly if he was blind he would not have be eligible for a licence
2006-09-12 07:02:04 · answer #10 · answered by sky 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋