Last week i turned down this trade down. Droughns, Fitz, & Bruce for Tiki & Moulds.
Fitz & Bruce have easier schedules playing in the weak NFC West so they should put up big numbers. But should i trade them?
Which trade would you make Tiki & Moulds for Fitz, Droughns & Bruce
or Tiki for Droughns & Fitz or Neithier
I also have Alexander and Chad Johnson on my team already.
2006-09-12 05:19:27 · 7 answers · asked by youncease 3 in Sports ➔ Fantasy Sports
i'm sorry i must have wrote it wrong. If the trade goes down i would be getting Tiki
2006-09-12 06:18:04 · update #1
i just accepted the original trade and i'm kinda regretting it after that last comment, should i be regretting this?
2006-09-12 11:33:55 · update #2
Put it this way..the Browns are terrible.....with that said they will always be behind in games (usually by alot) so they will have to pass most of the time.....Droughns doesnt catch passes out of the backfield...he doesnt even rip off 20-30 yard runs. he is pretty much a workhorse that can get yds in the first quarter when the game is still close. So its pretty much Fitz and Bruce for Tiki and Moulds.....Bruce wont see as many balls as he did in the past cuz the Rams are more of a running offense than they are "greatest show on turf".....Tiki is a top tier back (top 5) and Moulds is a legit #2 next to Andre Johnson. I like Tiki and Moulds.
2006-09-12 05:24:25 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
if you're the one getting barber and moulds, DON'T DO IT... tiki may be a great player, but moulds seems past his best days... alexander and droughns will do you fine at rb for the length of the season, and having fitz, bruce, and johnson never hurt anyone... you've got a pretty solid group of rb's and wr's, leave it as it is, the results should be in your favor, barring injury.
2006-09-12 14:02:20 · answer #2 · answered by John C. 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Make the original deal. Tiki will be a stud again this year. You already have a great WR in CJ so you can give up Fitz.
2006-09-12 12:33:05 · answer #3 · answered by Drunk365 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would stick with what you have. Moulds is nasty and now he is getting single coverage being opposite of Johnson. Tiki is like Faulk used to be, getting a ton of touches running and catching out of the backfield. Fitzgerald is the only perk to consider but I think you should stay where you are at.
2006-09-12 12:27:09 · answer #4 · answered by onthedlyoshi 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I can't quite tell which side of that trade you're on...but I would want Tiki and Moulds.
2006-09-12 12:28:39 · answer #5 · answered by KW 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Oh. Trade for Tiki if possible.
2006-09-12 13:52:43 · answer #6 · answered by James W 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
keep tiki and moulds, both consistant
2006-09-12 12:45:19 · answer #7 · answered by SS LAZIO 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋