Give it up, terrorist exist!
http://www.911myths.com/index.html
2006-09-12 05:09:56
·
answer #1
·
answered by jasonzbtzl 4
·
2⤊
2⤋
I think that the Bush family--the very very rich Bush family, had connections with the ruling family in Saudi Arabia. The Saudis contribute to terrorist organizations, including Al-Quaida. The Bush family did not want to "call out" the Saudis for fear of what it would do to business interests.
Also, it is to the benefit of the Saudis to have Iraq and Afghanistan in "war" and turmoil. So, it is quite possible that this was all cooked up to anger the American people enough to make us WANT to go to war with some Arabs somewhere. Then, in comes George W with an idea!! Why not go look for those WMD and "create" a new democracy.
For all of you who think that the American gov't. wouldn't kill its own citizens to line pockets with profit: Oh yeah?? What about Tuskeegee? What about the cities that were sprayed with various substnces, including bacteria, "to see how Americans react".? What about the innocent women and children in Iraq, that we have the nerve to call "collateral damage", as if they were a few trees that got knocked down? Don't you think that a few thousand Americans could be killed if it meant that we could get into the war that the rich folks wanted? Hey! a few thousand soldiers have been killed.
What about the people that are swtill not being taken care of in Louisianna????????? Our government treats us as the "slaves" they intend for us to be--the worker bees making money/honey for the queen/king.
Yeah! There was a conspiracy, but we will never know exactly what it was. Just know that the whole world is run by that 2% of people who own 98% of the wealth, and we can bang our heads from now until doomsdsay, and we"ll never wrest control from them. When we get restless or inquisitive, they cause us to have a "better" economy, so that we are happier. Or, they raise gas prices so that we start to hate all Arabs. Or they toss in a little "illegals are tasking all of our jobs" to point us towardsw another minority. (Because it's so easy to hate a minority, and so easy to blame them....)
Wow! I'm ranting...sorry, I'm just so damn mad about 9/11/01, and the way it came to be and the way it is being used now.
2006-09-12 05:26:02
·
answer #2
·
answered by Joey's Back 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
I know for a fact that Bill Clinton was the one behind that 9/11 attack. Prove otherwise.
It was planned on his watch.
He and the Ds put a wall between the FBI and CIA preventing the information needed to pass from one to the other.
He and the Ds gutted the US human intelligence operations during the 90s.
The training of pilots happened on his watch.
He turned down OBL's capture several times during his administration.
He did practically nothing to Al Qaeda during his watch.
He was either incompetent or in bed with OBL as well as Monica.
2006-09-12 05:24:54
·
answer #3
·
answered by SPLATT 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
nothing - unless it was a grand strategy - a pretext for invasion and conquest of the middle east - all those consumers for american product - I may be worth it in the long term for the us economically if that is the case -
I try not to think that bush is quite that evil
but since attacked yes - there is a pretext to invade any country suspected of terror or not aggreeing with the us or israel - one such as iran - that will be next
2006-09-12 05:12:40
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
everybody to their personal opinion. We might want to under no circumstances recognize for years what fairly exceeded off, i trust that the airplane in Pennsylvania develop into shot down.if it had in basic terms crashed there might want to of been extra debris. in spite of the undeniable fact that the area develop into very sparkling of debris the concept leads to that recommendations is that once the homes did collapsed it did collapsed contained in the instantly way. This recommend the principals that previous been positioned exposlives . yet you may ought to position the explosives on more effective than one element.even if there have been explosives on the area it continues to be open for debate. the dual towers were built to with stand a airplane crash. one difficulty that consistently haunted me is the actual undeniable reality that once President Bush develop into informed he acted as he already knew.They knew from the bombing of the storage of the international commerce middle that someone might want to come again to end the interest. 2 of the suicide crew stay really stay close to me and for months they practiced the flight simulator. Like Oklahoma city, i imagine and sense that a number of the funding got here from the middle east. I do in basic terms not imagine that human beings have widely used a sparkling link.
2016-11-26 19:45:49
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Did you have to post this? Couldn't you read one of the other 7,000 other conspiracy posts.
The youtube and loosechange videos have been debunked. There is nothing of substance to them. Many people were able to see the flaws from the very beginning. Snopes does an excellent job explaining how you are falling prey to anti-Bush propaganda. And just in time for elections.
But I guess your timing for asking this is just a coincidence.
2006-09-12 05:16:49
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
Youtube=crap. No, Bush or the government nor Clinton nor anyone who worked for them had absolutely, positively, NOTHING to do with 9/11. Was that clear enough?
2006-09-12 05:15:15
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
Not Bush..it was Clinton's fault cause of his very lax foreign policy for 8 years. He gave terrorists a haven to pretty much do & plan whatever they want...after all the work done by the Gulf War.
2006-09-12 05:16:07
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
Yes, terrorist exist. Bush is one of them himself.....
Yes, he had plenty to do with the attacks. And, instead of using yesterday as a day of mourning, he used it to futher cement into the minds of America that Iraq has something to do with this alleged war on terror...even after it has been proven that Sadaam had NO TIES with Al-Queda and did not support them. Instead, he goes on record saying that Sadaam was a threat - to WHo?? Certainly not to America. To his own people? In that case, I can name several other countries commiting human rights abuses as well - but they have no oil under their land, so they arent worth defending......
Furthermore, I find it rather intersting that we found Sadaam in a hole in the ground in Iraq, but we cant seem to find bin Laden in a cave....And is it a coincidence that the bin Laden family was actually in Texas visiting with Bush Sr. when the attacks took place? Ask yourself - why would Bush hunt down and kill the son of a family friend? He wont. Thats why bin Laden is still free today - they are in cahoots.
2006-09-12 05:15:25
·
answer #9
·
answered by YDoncha_Blowme 6
·
2⤊
2⤋
Bush bashers will say about anything, I heard they thought bush was responsible for the birth of jesus, and I heard that back in moses time that bush was angry with god because god spoke to moses throught the burning bush.....
2006-09-12 05:13:27
·
answer #10
·
answered by lost&confused 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
I totally think bush and his father had something to do with it! They are just power hungry, and they don't care who they hurt as long as they are taken care of! All bush and bush sr. want is war, that is there answer for everything!!
2006-09-12 05:19:19
·
answer #11
·
answered by yoshi 1
·
0⤊
1⤋