And who also claimed he "heard" Bill Clinton "use the N-word on the radio".
AND who claimed "Since Dems 'make' minorities wards of the state". they "make" minorities.I love it! Ha!
Whatever happened to facts?
Where's the credibilty of this garbage?
Where are the serious conservative's outrage?
Is that smearing,or a hoax?
2006-09-12 05:02:16 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
alessandra- real lady,real answer!
Smarter than CON men again.10 points!
2006-09-12 05:11:02 · update #1
macy daddy boss(eyes rool) -not as easily as yours,false Lib basher!
2006-09-12 05:14:35 · update #2
mymadsky- Hi! Thank you.good answer.
2006-09-12 05:19:10 · update #3
They are grasping at straws...a last ditch effort before they lose in Novemeber.
2006-09-12 05:15:28 · answer #1 · answered by mymadsky 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
The original KKK was almost entirely democrat and southern. Later incarnations included substantial numbers of both republicans and democrats. The 1924 Democratic national convention was heavily influenced by the KKK - it took 100 ballots to resolve a stalemate between the Klan backed candidate and an 'opposed' one, with a third compromise candidate being chosen. Klan delegates defeated a Democratic Party platform plank that would have condemned their organization.
Making a big deal out of this is not a hoax, but it is, to some extent, smearing. Neither party today should really claim much credit nor take much criticism for positions held or members allowed 50-150 years ago.
2006-09-12 05:32:13 · answer #2 · answered by kheserthorpe 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Realistically, it is all nevertheless backlash from Bush. The electorate gave him of challenge for 5 years, then in 2006, grew to become on him and elected Democrats to congress. Seeing as how those Democrats did not something, the human beings overwhelmingly positioned greater in skill. Democrats rather plenty administration the government right this moment, so there is not any excuses why they are in a position to't or won't do what they reported (different than they actuality that they are Democrats). Bush is long gone, not can he be there scapegoat. in case you do away with Bush from the equation of the final 8 years, we actually don't have a bad social gathering. merely fairly some civil unrest against a pacesetter that became gave the impression to be incorrect for our u . s . a .. i think of that is in hassle-free terms a rely of having president Obama which would be our resurgence, he won't be in a position to probable grant on what he grants. The economic equipment won't boost, unemployment gets worse, and his costly tax plans and kin spending will turn the human beings far off from him. that's in hassle-free terms a rely of time.
2016-10-14 22:20:19 · answer #3 · answered by ranford 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Jim,
Not smearing. Not a hoax.
A conspiracy theory.
KKK= Kooky Kansas Koolaid=The Republican's new drink that they're going to buy off voters with.
Since they accuse us of being drug smoking liberals, why don't we figure out a way to pour some of Rush's illicit Colombian drugs in the kool-aid so they vote Independent instead.
Paul K quoted on 9/06/06:
Double Mint. Both the R and the D seem to attract the "extreme". I believe the answers are usually in the middle and I recognize the need for compromise. I also think it is important to know the person. When I vote, it is usually 1/4 R, 1/4 D, The remaining are Independent or left blank.
Go double mint go!
*The 10 pts. should be reserved for the republican in here who vouches to test a kool-aid sample.*
Don't forget the KKK members became ex-Democrat during the 50's and 60's when civil rights was on the party's agenda. They flocked to the conservative republican party instead.
2006-09-12 05:06:06 · answer #4 · answered by Egroeg_Rorepme 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Well,, it was not Bill Clinton who said ****** on the radio and TV...it was Senator Byrd who said it on Meet the Press. That is an undisputed fact.
And actually, yes, the KKK started as a militant wing of the Democrat Party during reconstruction. Sorry if the truth on that one hurts, but you see, the Republicans freed the slaves, nationalized blacks, and even appointed black judges in the south during reconstruction. Angry white democrats responded and formed the ghosts of the confederacy, known as the KKK, and began killing blacks, Jews, catholics, and carpet-baggers.
President Grant sent the military back into the south to crush the KKK (BTW, Grant was a Rep.), and knocked out about 90% of the KKK. The KKK resurfaced as a major political player again in the 20th century as the militant resistance of the Dixiecrat's, a group representing the majority of the democrat party who was committed to segregation then, segregation now, and segregation forever.
So before you go blah blah blah, you might want to research your history.
2006-09-12 05:13:20 · answer #5 · answered by lundstroms2004 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Well actually, the KKK did start in the Democratic party. Way back then, the Dems were the slave owners and repubs were for settin them free. At some point later on tho there was a migration or switch of a sorts where repubs floated to the dem party and vice versa.
2006-09-12 05:26:47 · answer #6 · answered by rolla_jay510 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Yes...It is historically accurate. That is a fact.
Your party's senior senator and the longest serving member of the US Senate ever was a venerable member of the KKK. That is also a fact.
2006-09-12 05:59:15 · answer #7 · answered by C B 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You can't trust any extreme righty or lefty. Almost everybody has an agenda, yours shows through very well.
2006-09-12 05:11:14 · answer #8 · answered by Vincent Valentine 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
who cares. where is the question?
2006-09-12 05:05:31 · answer #9 · answered by Super Shiraz 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
who cares.
2006-09-12 05:04:16 · answer #10 · answered by k-mac 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋