I trade D. Branch, S. Smith, & D. Foster for Portis & J. Galloway. Is this good or bad? Here's my roster:
QB D. Bledsoe
WR S. Smith
WR J. Walker
RB C. Williams
RB D. Foster
TE A. Crumpler
W/R T. Henry
K S. Janikowski
DEF Baltimore
D D. Hall
BN D. Branch
BN B. Favre
BN T. Duckett
BN K. Winslow
BN J. Porter
BN M. Vanderjagt
2006-09-12 05:02:03 · 12 answers · asked by kerrih11 2 in Sports ➔ Fantasy Sports
I haven't made the trade... it was proposed to me and I thought it looked bad just wanted to double check. Thanks everyone!!
2006-09-12 05:22:53 · update #1
Bad trade! Smith is capable of rolling up 18 TDs once healthy.
Portis is good, but also dinged. Foster is a starter on a productive team, and Branch is probably going to be the #1 WR for Seattle.
Galloway was good last year, but Simms has a long way to go.
You are giving up way to much. Feel free to trade Foster and Branch, but get something useful, say Edge in return. Sweeten the pot if you have too...
2006-09-12 06:10:04 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I would never want Portis this year. He is injury prone. He was backing up Ladell Betts in the season opener last night because of a sore shoulder. He has also had many different injuries over the years. Also Joey Galloway will not outscore Steve Smith or Deion Branch this year. Plus Deion Branch just got traded to the Seahawks. He'll have a huge year. I am a Bucs fan and Galloway isn't on any of my teams. Someone got you bad on this one. Sorry.
2006-09-12 12:09:25 · answer #2 · answered by Kail K 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes.
Bad trade.
If it was another top tier RB then it may of been okay. Javon Walker will be okay. Galloway will get atleast 1000 yards this year, but your RB game is hurrrrting.
With the exception of Cadillac you had no solid starter all year. Travis Henry is waiting to get traded. Foster is waiting to get hurt, and Ducket only plays third down.
If Portis comes back at 100%, then it won't be as bad of a trade, but you could've gotten more for Smith, Branch and Foster.
2006-09-12 12:07:47 · answer #3 · answered by audemars 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think its a bad trade. Portis has a bad shoulder which will limit him this year. Galloway will not have a year like he did last year. Branch will be good in Seattle and Smith will come back and rock! Foster is okay. You gave up too much.
2006-09-12 12:04:52 · answer #4 · answered by Drunk365 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
why do you have to give up three players for two? All these players are going to be questionable this season due to injuries and other problems. I am assuming you want Portis, so why not counter with Steve Smith for Portis. Or if you are lucky may be Foster for Portis.
2006-09-12 13:19:59 · answer #5 · answered by NY K 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Terrible trade. You are trading 2 premier receivers and a premier RB for a hurt RB and trashy receiver.
Also, dump Favre. start Winslow over Crumpler.
2006-09-12 12:05:53 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
you got ripped off, but not as bad as everyone else says.
If portis returns to last year's form it won't be that bad. But you sure gave up a lot of premium players for two question marks.
2006-09-12 12:20:02 · answer #7 · answered by akristel2003 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That is a pretty bad trade because Galloway's production will be hurt by his quarterback's poor play.
2006-09-12 12:04:49 · answer #8 · answered by Poopie Johnson 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i would say so but it still isn't as bad as the yankees trading soriano for arod thats probably the worst trade of all time
2006-09-12 12:11:23 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yeah!
2006-09-12 12:03:27 · answer #10 · answered by NONAME 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋