Not bloody likely in Iraq, eh?
2006-09-12 04:21:18 · 17 answers · asked by john b 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Nope, I honestly feel he's being railroaded. I don't know of any countries leaders that wouldn't kill those who attempted to assassinate them!
Shoot, look what Lil 'w's doing to Saddam and he only threatened to kill "Bushdaddy". The Iraqi's never fired a shot at us before we invaded.
Invading Iraq in retaliation for 9/11 was like invading Mexico in retaliation for Pearl Harbor... not logical at all.
2006-09-12 04:26:40 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Fairer than maximum detrimental human beings get. I doubt his guilt might stand under US regulation yet he's answering to Badgag regulation and the decide and jury are vindictive human beings needing his destruction. Saddam's maximum obvious character faults, at the instant are not what he's being charged with. He became into acquitted interior the 300 and sixty 5 days long Mass homicide of Kurds trial Now this homicide of Shea trial became into speedy and decisive. i hit upon it extra of a sworn assertion of Shea aggression than a tribulation. Hezbollah (the remote places militant arm of Shea) murdered a great number of folk related with the trial that no person might think of of something different than responsible. So Saddam a Bathest and classic Sunni is discovered responsible of killing Shea as a results of Shea dying squads killing all Sunni in touch interior the trial. OH Yeah democracy is actual working in Badgag. bypass enormous pink bypass
2016-12-12 07:07:20 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
not bloody likely ANYWHERE! No, I don't, and if he were looked at as a regular criminal, he wouldn't be considered competent to stand trial. But, he never espoused fair trials for his country either, so I don't really care...
2006-09-12 04:23:30 · answer #3 · answered by hichefheidi 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Saddam should get a fair trial and then be shot.
2006-09-12 04:24:14 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
If it's run by the USA it won't be a fair trial.
2006-09-12 04:22:53 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Nope, I think the a**hole ought to be shot instead. Who needs a trial with him?
2006-09-12 04:29:00 · answer #6 · answered by joonam_21 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
He is getting a lot fairer trial then his regime gave others. Personally I hoped he'd go like his sons.
2006-09-12 04:22:30 · answer #7 · answered by Spadesboffin 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Yeah right.Its probably not even him on trial.I bet its a look alike.Saddam and Osama are on an island hiding somewhere put there by the US government.
2006-09-12 04:23:32 · answer #8 · answered by stephaniemariewalksonwater 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
To be honest I don't think it's fair that he's getting a trial. He needs to be put to death for all his crimes.
2006-09-12 04:23:16 · answer #9 · answered by Alison 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
he needs to be taken out and shot like he did to all those people.....did those people get a fair trial before they were shot and burried in a ditch....NO..so why keep him alive longer than what he deserves
2006-09-12 04:24:42 · answer #10 · answered by Brittany's man 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋