people that are mad are killing them 10 fold in Australlia
2006-09-12 03:42:01 · 26 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Current Events
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060912/ap_on_re_au_an/crocodile_hunter_stingray_killings
you play with fire and irritate nature - what did you expect to happen?
2006-09-12 03:52:28 · update #1
Let's face it - he never cared about nature. He harrased animals with pointy sticks to rile them up, and fed a hungry croc at the side of a wet swimming pool with his one month old kiddie carelessly tucked under one arm. When confronted about the swimming pool/crocodile/baby thing, he started screaming like a lunatic, saying something about "giant meteors" hitting Australia. His contribution to TV has been such, that now we longer have REAL nature programmes - it's all shite like "100 top deadly spders", or "Natures most EXTREME killers", and "natures evil predators". I hope the arseholes who worship this nonentity will grow up ( and stop harrassing wildlife, like their hero).
2006-09-12 03:48:32 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 5⤋
No it is not appropriate!!
The Stingray only did what comes natural to him to defend itself.It had no vendetta against Steve.
The poor animal evidently felt surrounded or trapped between the camera person ,Steve and the sandy bottom.
It is an automatic defense mechanism.
If Steve had of killed the ray then would these people be hunting down all men named Steve to avenge the ray.
And anyway the whole idea of killing or hunting down any animal was appalling to Steve and is against everything Steve stood for !!!
2006-09-12 04:34:30 · answer #2 · answered by Darlene S 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
No and I really liked Steve Irwin. He lived on the edge and he always knew he was taking chances. He was in the Stingray's domain. When we go into another species domain, we have to KNOW that there is always a chance of their defending themselves and thus causing harm to the intruder. It is very sad that Steve Irwin died. He DID die doing what he loved to do, however. May he rest in peace.
2006-09-12 03:45:44 · answer #3 · answered by Royallady1947 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No, not appropriate at all. It goes against all and everything that Steve Irwin tryed to instill in everyone. He always was aware that if something did happen to him from a small bite or a full on attack, it is not the animals fault at all, only his.
2006-09-12 04:27:22 · answer #4 · answered by kristielarry 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no way that's rediculous! He knew the perils of his job and constantly reminded viewers of it. He was an avid protector of animals and would surely be very angry to hear that! The animal was protecting itself in the way nature/God gave it to do so. Steve Irwin would understood this, didn't anyone pay ATTENTION to his show?
2006-09-12 03:45:48 · answer #5 · answered by Slutlana 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No, it is not appropriate. Anyone who kills a stingray to "avenge his death" is an asinitic kook. I am sorry about what happened to him, but he was in their territory, not vice versa, and it was a self-defense mechanism on the stingray's part.
2006-09-12 03:50:09 · answer #6 · answered by Designchc 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No, but emotional reaction and rationale thinking are two different things. You are thinking rationally, the people killing stingrays are reacting emotionally.
2006-09-12 04:21:02 · answer #7 · answered by Tony Z 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nah! It's not like it's gonna bring him back from the grave. And besides, i don't think steve irwin would like that.
2006-09-12 04:19:20 · answer #8 · answered by nanuh 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think that Steve Erwin would be very unhappy if he is watching from heaven. If people learned anything from him it is to appreciate all the animals and life itself. I know that some people say he risked too much in his life but he sure seemed to enjoy life, didn't he?
2006-09-12 03:46:32 · answer #9 · answered by The_answer_person 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋
That's terrible!! It's not the stingray's fault! It was just defending itself!
Steve Irwin is probably spinning in his grave! (God rest his soul).
2006-09-12 03:43:14 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
you have chose the genuine answer? hear to me, i'm a 12 300 and sixty 5 days previous christian... your maximum sturdy source. ok, so as that they do no longer 'ruin it to you' such as you may think of, they examine the story each time Christmas and Easter come around, so as that they have got it down at an exceedingly youthful age, i became into reciting John 3:sixteen on the age of two. it is the completed tale summarized into one verse. in case you do no longer believe me, right here it is. John 3:sixteen For God so enjoyed the worldwide, that he gave his one and in basic terms Son, so as that whoever believes in Him, shall no longer perish yet have eternal existence. we don't act like it is a few enormous element, nicely we do, yet no longer how your thinking. it is particularly the main needed element interior the worldwide, yet we don't act like... If in basic terms i'd desire to have been in basic terms a splash extra effective! Why?! Whyyyyy?! we are satisfied that he became into keen to die for us, and that he loves us plenty, yet we do sense responsible each and every so often to boot. in spite of the undeniable fact that it is in simple terms approximately like a motivation, believe in Christ, and verify out to be good, so God won't would desire to sacrifice lower back. all of us comprehend he does not, yet thats style of ways we sense each and every so often. optimistically you examine this, and the far extra sturdy of a source would desire to you get? i'm a Christian youngster! :)
2016-12-12 07:06:26 · answer #11 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋