Thats a no-brainer! Get it!
2006-09-12 03:21:20
·
answer #1
·
answered by Skeeter 5
·
2⤊
1⤋
Ahhhh, a trick question! Who would win a 'battle of the wits' indeed, when both competitors are unarmed. This could never happen. There are no wits necessary to engage in a battle, hence there would BE no battle so this scenario is fictional. Much like the unicorn; it's a mythical, fantasy story.
2006-09-12 04:58:09
·
answer #2
·
answered by dusty_roade 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Nicky
2006-09-12 03:25:00
·
answer #3
·
answered by NETTA M 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Nicky
2006-09-12 03:23:20
·
answer #4
·
answered by SCH 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
Nicky
2006-09-12 03:20:26
·
answer #5
·
answered by RACQUEL 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
i'm relatively finding forward to this Ashes sequence and truthfully have not thoroughly written the Aussies off. however England ought to bypass into the sequence as overwhelming favourites by way of present day variety and the undeniable fact that the sequence is being performed in England. I reckon Chris Rogers may well be slightly a dark horse as he's conscious of the circumstances over right here particularly plenty. good to be certain some friendly banter flying around between the two contraptions of supporters too!
2016-12-18 09:00:26
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Nicky, because although she may be a dim WIT, she's doesn't seem as big a f**kWIT as Paris. IMHO.
2006-09-12 03:20:53
·
answer #7
·
answered by His Best Girl 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
I'll have to say Nicky. At least she has an education.
2006-09-12 05:33:59
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Paris hands down .... Nichole she'd be second best!
2006-09-12 03:21:18
·
answer #9
·
answered by beba_angel 1
·
0⤊
1⤋
You have to have competitors with their wits about them to start with.
2006-09-12 03:28:35
·
answer #10
·
answered by pipi08_2000 7
·
1⤊
0⤋