Think of it, Clinton's a fool, Bush is an idiot. Don't you think it's time a woman president changed the dynamics of what is happening for the USA? Imagine all that she could accomplish. I'm not talking about RICE either. But maybe Hillary. I think they will push for her next. Too bad you only have a choice of one or the other but frankly, someone has to put the world right, and it isn't going to be any man. No offense guys. You know the magic women can weave so don't deny I am right.
2006-09-12
02:58:44
·
14 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Other - Politics & Government
Name me names if not Hillary or Rice...whose out there worth promoting???
2006-09-12
03:02:06 ·
update #1
Thanks Nas...you're going for the points now aren't you! :~)
2006-09-12
03:11:57 ·
update #2
Sorry RYK...Clinton WAS a fool...yes he was a great president but just like a man he let his lustful ways RUIN HIM. That's a fool in my book...had a good thing and blew it...thus my question of if it's time for a woman president.
2006-09-12
03:15:03 ·
update #3
That's great ScrEagle...I'm counting on guys like you...LOL
And if I were Pres...beleive me the world would not be in this current mess.
2006-09-12
03:16:31 ·
update #4
Oooh...KB...you would be just the type of guy I'd have serving us in boardrooms.
2006-09-12
07:24:25 ·
update #5
.....and picking up my suits from the cleaners.
2006-09-12
07:25:52 ·
update #6
a woman would definitely better
2006-09-12 03:02:55
·
answer #1
·
answered by Special 5
·
3⤊
0⤋
I would vote for a woman. I would vote for Hillary as President. Rice has no experience in politics or Government other than saying yes to Bush, I would not want another President in Office like Bush with no experience in Federal Government.
We have a Federal spending deficit of one trillion US dollars per year under Republicans, we have a trade deficit of over $50 billion per month under Republicans. In July 2006 it was $68 billion. China had a surplus trade that same month of $19 billion. America can not “stay this course” and survive. Yes in the economy many say the glass is half full, I say it's half empty. The state of the glass is not the real question. The real question is. Who will fill it when it's all empty? Will it be the wealthy of our nation or will it be the working class taxpayers?
2006-09-12 03:08:01
·
answer #2
·
answered by jl_jack09 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
i'd not settle for Obama specially because he hasnt been contained in the political international lengthy sufficient to enable me know how he might want to do yet i might want to vote in Condalisa Rice in a coronary heart beat. She is smart, astounding, and maximum significant she doesnt spew political crap that maximum existence time politicians do. You in no way see her pointing the finger declaring that human being is responsible for the area. in reality they requested her to run for president yet she refused. specially because i imagine she realizes that the president truly has little or no means to do something yet might want to take the blame for each thing. If with the help of a few act of god they ever get her to run for president i imagine she will be in a position to be voted in. Sorry were given off the concern. Race might want to in no way come into it. it will be on the way you arise on your pricipiles, your values of what proper and incorrect are, and maximum significant the way you're taking duty on your words and moves. i'm a white male yet nevertheless experience Condalisa Rice is the proper candidate for president in Washington. the surely different sturdy candidate I have considered replaced into ross pero and regrettably he didnt win yet were given clinton elected. I dont like the republican or democratic social gathering yet have said that alot of republicans will vote outdoors their social gathering traces for what they imagine is a sturdy candidate the position as democratic voters will vote democratic no be counted what their candidate has executed.
2016-11-26 19:35:33
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Elect a split tail and she will become a fool and a idiot too------ I dont know why but women are short term thinkers ,they wanted to be on naval ships with men and look most of them got pregant and kick out of the navy, now they want to be on submarines where the hot bunk is order of the day ( you sleep in the bunk until time for your watch and then your relief swaps so he can get some rest) what a crock------- I love women but they are not cut out for the job of president or vice president i dont care what the celebrities say it wont fly except back in your face-------i worked in an office with 80 women and it was some kind of cat fight going on all the time--------as their supervisor i had to take my work home to complete because these cat fights comsumed so much time---------you must be a woman to even suggest this ideal---------i'll give you some advice ,stay home and keep house and enjoy your husband and you will be a lot happier if you're not a lesbian and is totaly another ball of wax and feathers ( crap)
2006-09-12 03:28:08
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
3⤋
picks for president.
Senetor Evan Bayh of Indiana or
Senetor Hilary Clinton of New York
2006-09-12 03:19:37
·
answer #5
·
answered by tennisboyusa 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
A woman won't be elected president until the fact that she IS a woman is no longer an issue. It will only happen when the quality of her ideas and plans for America are worthy of serious consideration.
2006-09-12 03:05:14
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I like Hilary she has a bigger set of balls then most men and isn't afraid to speak her mind. Condi is a Bush clone, no thank you I think I have had enough of him for the past 8 years.
The Clintons ran the country better then most presidents. Who do you think really ran it the first time? I doubt Bill made all the decisions. Hilary would be a good choice.
2006-09-12 03:03:05
·
answer #7
·
answered by kisstineb 2
·
3⤊
1⤋
The fact that someone is a women shouldn't qualify her to be president any more than someone's being a man.
Gender should be irrelevant, as should ethnic background, religion (or the lack of it), etc.
If you'll examine how well/badly women leaders of other countries have done (Maggie Thatcher, Indira Ghandi. etc.) you'll see they certainly had their faults.
2006-09-12 03:08:13
·
answer #8
·
answered by johnslat 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
i agree with bush bein a idiot but clintons a fool????????
thats laughable clinton was one of the best presidents ever
if all women were like you and the presidents like clinton were
bad which is a counter productive thought then we'll never
have a woman president
2006-09-12 03:09:28
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
If a woman was to become president in USA it would not be the voters making it happen.
2006-09-12 03:27:00
·
answer #10
·
answered by bulabate 5
·
0⤊
2⤋
Yes but not Mrs Clinton. she is far to radical for the mainstream. It would never happen
2006-09-12 03:01:03
·
answer #11
·
answered by Crystal A 2
·
0⤊
2⤋