English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

if Bush had not delayed in meeting with his anti terrorism adviser for 9 months would the twin towers still be standing?

2006-09-12 02:07:22 · 12 answers · asked by brinlarrr 5 in Politics & Government Politics

12 answers

yes they would be from what I have learnt it was a total stuff up by america in every way that caused the two towers to fall, total lack of communication between all security councils, makes you wonder why they wont talk to each other, lets hope they talk more now since that happened

2006-09-12 02:26:03 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The twin rowers would stand today and several thousand Americans would be alive today if the Bush junta would have reacted to the memo of August 6th 2001. They knew what was planned and instead of protecting the American people they took a step back and thought about how they could use this situation to their advantage.
Quickly they figured out that this would be the best thing that could possibly happen to them and they made sure that the attacks would be a smashing success. Clearly ... a simple plane crash doesn't demolish tow buildings and lets them fall nicely into their foot prints. The Bush junta coldly wasted several thousands of American lives in order to further their agenda of greed.

2006-09-12 09:39:32 · answer #2 · answered by The answer man 4 · 1 0

Knowing that Bush even have the time to listen to some kid telling stories about a goat after he got the new of the Towers being attacked... I would say YES!

2006-09-12 09:10:23 · answer #3 · answered by Chauvel 2 · 1 1

No, since Clinton let Osama live why aren't you looking at him. Also, how do you know Bush didn't meet with that adviser. I seriously doubt he went 9 months and never talked with him, had meeting. You leftists really need to be sent to the nut house.

2006-09-12 09:11:19 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

If bush had done his job a lot of things would be different
BUT
according to the repubs this is all Clintons fault- If Clinton had done bush's job none of the problems would have happened!

2006-09-12 09:14:59 · answer #5 · answered by Anarchy99 7 · 1 0

And what would sitting down to chat with this guy have done better than a memo? If this guy had info, why did he not disseminate it? Do you really think presidents sit down with every last advisor in their administration?

All this type of stuff gets screened by his appointees and administration team. If they have nothing worth the president's attention, they don't get a personal audience with him.

2006-09-12 09:29:00 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

No. George Bush the first and his CIA buddies planned to kill Americans with your hard earned tax dollars. The Bush clan is to blame.

2006-09-12 09:14:46 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

I'll answer your question with another question. If Clinton had responded to the U.S. Cole bombing and the embassy bombings in his "years" in office would 9/11 have happened? Lets put things in perspective.

2006-09-12 09:18:48 · answer #8 · answered by ldrmacman 1 · 0 0

No - The Bush administration was involved in the planning of 9/11. Like the plan to invade Iraq and bomb Iran these things are not prevented by the Neocon government but facilitated by them.

2006-09-12 09:08:40 · answer #9 · answered by Bring back Democracy 3 · 3 3

Didn't you hear Clinton was at fault for everything that happens in Bush's watch, even the Iraq war.

2006-09-12 09:09:38 · answer #10 · answered by Special Olympian 1 · 1 2

fedest.com, questions and answers