The proof is in your face. Twenty years with a clandestine program that they did not willingly divulge. Nuclear inspectors being banned. The warlike rhetoric of Hitler. what is it in President Adamdajeen(sp) posture that shows he is after peace. this guy is a joke and so is the Iranian goverment. not that war is the answer but talk seems less likely to work with the radicals who want to be a world player. my question is, if there is no pursuit of nuclear weapons then why not allow in inspectors to back them up against the UNITED STATES and other world domination driven powers?
2006-09-12 01:31:52 · 6 answers · asked by BRYAN H 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
The neocon war drums are beating again. They've been building towards war with Iran for well over a year now.
The IAEA has had go-anywhere, see-anything inspections in Iran all along, and they have yet to uncover a shred of evidence indicating that Iran is pursuing nuclear weaponry. Sure, the neocons deride them as incompetent... but ya know? The exact same thing happened in Iraq, and whaddya know, it turned out that the IAEA was right all along - Saddam wasn't developing nukes at all.
According to the CIA, Iran is a minimum of five years away from developing nuclear weaponry if the devote all their resources to it. There's no excuse for the U.S. starting another war in the middle east at this time, no matter how unsavory the Iranian regime is.
The best strategy is to contain and wait - just like we did with the soviet union. The mullahs in Iran are not popular; given time, the Iranian people will boot them out. However, if we attack Iran, the entire populace will unite with their regime against the United States. Considering how much trouble Iraq and Afghanistan are giving us, it would be sheer folly to take on Iran at the same time.
Unfortunately, Bush's foreign policy is guided by his religious visions of the end times. Sheer folly doesn't concern him.
2006-09-12 01:51:42 · answer #1 · answered by Bramblyspam 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Iran has diverse "nuclear" centers. even as there is not any longer an excellent quantity of evidence at this aspect, one might want to seem at Iran's status contained in the international. The are a terrorist regime. They help terrorism in scuffling with US troops in Iraq, they continuously call for the elimination of Israel. in addition they play video games with the United countries. those are not from now on evidence of nuclear guns, yet basically rationalization why they might want to no longer be allowed to get carry of them.
2016-11-26 19:30:57 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
against the UNITED STATES and other world domination driven powers?
This just shot you down. Instead of a question I know this is just another brainless anti-American diatribe. How much is the Iranian Secret Police paying you to post this trash?
2006-09-12 01:51:10 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Of course they are and God help the free world if they achieve their goal.
2006-09-12 01:35:33 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
i agree but wouldn't it be funny and sad if we invade Iran
and they are setting us up
can u say...no weapons of mass destruction
that could be their real agenda
2006-09-12 01:36:53 · answer #5 · answered by Enigma 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Let's look at the bright side.............. maybe, just maybe they will self-explode with this nuclear stuff they are playing with!!!!!
mb
2006-09-12 01:38:34 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋