It really showed how weak Clinton was and how the CIA and the others ****** up when Clinton was in office. Clinton had a chance if you saw it to kill Osama and has he not have opened his big mouth to the Palestians saying "Yea i'm going to send a missle through your are, don't worry about it" b/c he was scared of a nuclear war had that happened? Clinton seemed to have forgotton that the US is the superpower and should not be threaten. But, hey what's done is done.
And did any of you have any trouble with the station going in and out? a couple of guys joked that it was the Dems fooling around with ABC, but what happened on part 2? I was only able to catch part one.
2006-09-12 01:13:22 · 9 answers · asked by TJ 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
I thought it was very good mini-series and it showed exactly how screwed up the Clinton administration was.
2006-09-12 01:18:58 · answer #1 · answered by Vagabond5879 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
TJ - I appreciate the fact that you found this to be entertaining, but it has been documented on several occasions by ABC execs that this was a docudrama, and not a factual account in any way shape or form of the events that led up to the 9/11 tragedy.
Even the movie WTC had interviews with the people involved, and according to the people it was about, pretty factual, except that the marine who pulled the cop out was black in real life, but white in the movie. Even the marine said - "That day we had no color - We were all gray with soot."
ABC made no excuses - they slightly modified the final version after an uproar was made by the actual survivors of the 9/11 tragedy.
Anyone who would take such a solemn occasion to turn a quick buck is irresponsible and disrespectful of the people who died during these events.
2006-09-12 01:38:40 · answer #2 · answered by crisagi 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yes...it was actually the truth about clinton...but he told ABC that they had to put the disclaimer in saying that it was not factual...but we all really know it was. What gets me is that Micheal Moron, er I mean Moore's conspericy film was consitered a documentery (and the RNC didn't cry about it...just ignored it)...but this mini-series is consitered to be NOT a documentry even though it was scripted after the 9/11 commision report.
Humm...good ol' Bill Clinton...He must have some blackmail on someone at ABC...
2006-09-12 01:25:42 · answer #3 · answered by DAVER 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Its funny how people blamed bush for 911 when he wasnt in office long enough to do anything about 911 except listen & review documents.
While bushs admin knew something they only knew the same stuff that clintons group knew too.
For me, "path" was a lot more honest movie than F911.
2006-09-12 01:28:17 · answer #4 · answered by pcreamer2000 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Part two showed how Bush screwed up, he had plenty of warnings and disregarded them. He knew it was coming and did nothing. I thought all in all it was an entertaining movie and I didn't see and bia's as there was plenty of blame to go around. They didn't get around to the Iraqi war, the war based on lies told by none other then George Bush.
2006-09-12 01:18:08 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Part 2 showed after George dubya won the election that his administration screwed things up even more....
2006-09-12 01:16:23 · answer #6 · answered by Andy FF1,2,CrTr,4,5,6,7,8,9,10 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Have not seen it yet. I recorded it on my DVR and will edit the commercials then put it on dvd. then i'll watch it.
2006-09-12 01:25:10 · answer #7 · answered by Q-burt 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It showed how inept the Govt is no matter who is in power,
2006-09-12 01:15:31 · answer #8 · answered by Zen 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Its fiction. FFS
2006-09-12 01:16:54 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋