In relation to sexual performance, it depends. If there was a serious problem with the foreskin before, it'll improve afterwards. If there was no problem with the foreskin before, it's a coin toss. Some people like it better afterwards, some people had bad experiences with their circumcisions and thus hate it afterwards.
In relation to premature ejaculation, no effect in the long run. If circumcision really made guys last longer, then very few circumcised guys would have problems with premature ejaculation. Sensitivity is in the mind, sensation is in the body.
2006-09-10 03:30:55
·
answer #2
·
answered by trebla_5 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Circumcision changes a man that could be a tender, considerate lover into a mindless, deep thrusting, hard breathing, orgasm seeking machine. Trying to "get off" before she asks him to get off. I know because that has been me with my half numb, cut stick, a victim of childhood circumcision 50 years ago.
I have been wearing a protective penis sheath under my clothing for about two months (see senslip.com) and have experienced a great improvement in sensitivity as my glans has come back to life. I can now feel my wife respond to me. Our loving is now much more satisfying to both of us and less like a race. However I know this is only recovering about 1% of what I lost at the hands of that ####ing doctor, my foreskin with 240 feet of nerves and 20,000 special nerve endings that can never be replaced. That is the terrible damage circumcision does.
There is little relationship between circumcision and premature ejaculation. If a guy spills as soon as her panties come off, making a payment on some dick cutting doctor's Lexus is not going to solve the problem. There are therapeutic exercises that can help, check the online advice columns of men's magazines such as menshealth.com. I would read a lot of books before going for willy whittling.
2006-09-12 19:55:06
·
answer #3
·
answered by cut50yearsago 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
There's no such thing as "premature ejaculation." What happens is natural, so it's not "premature." That a liberal myth, like global warming. And circumcision has no effect.
You're better off completing the act as soon as possible, and most women would prefer that, if the truth be known.
2006-09-09 21:33:37
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
3⤋
Circumcision started in the US to stop boys from masturbating; they will take much longer to reach the orgasm, and the orgasm will not be as intense, but that will not stop them.
Nowadays the “medical” reasons to circumcision are for Doctors to make MONEY!!!
RELIGION--If God intended boys to not have "skin" He would have made them so.
http://www.nocirc.org/religion/
HYGIENE--Use a new invention, soap and water!!! Women produce much more “smegma”, all kinds of discharges, wetness, and smells; because of physiologic and anatomical reasons, and how would you feel if they cut your vulva lips??? Women, why don’t you answer my question, are you afraid? Baby girls are more likely to get urinary tract infections and no one suggests we surgically alter them at birth to reduce the risks! Just one of many double standards and laws that always treat men worse.
MEDICAL REASONS--No medical reasons. A extremely small chance of a complication do not justify the removal of the foreskin, if so, why don't we remove the tonsils and the appendix when a child is born, and the chance of complications of the tonsils and the appendix is much greater. And for infections of all the organs, including female organs, use a new invention called antibiotics. Talking about complications, in fact many baby boys die each year from circumcision and related complications.
EVEN if phimosis occurs, instead of chopping it off like barbarians!, use Conservative Treatments like:
-Topical Medication(non-traumatic and non-destructive)
-Dilation and Stretching(non-traumatic and non-destructive)
-Combination treatment(non-traumatic and non-destructive)
-Preputioplasty is the medical term for plastic surgery of the prepuce or foreskin(many methods).
If you want more detail on Conservative Treatments, go here:
http://www.cirp.org/library/treatment/phimosis/
And now they invented a new reason to make money, the risk of STD in uncircumcised men. Well actually uncircumcised men have more protection, but in practical terms that protection means nothing, because circumcised or not, if you have sex without protection and your partner have an STD you will be infected FOR SURE! That means, it is just one more stupid and desperate reason in order to make money with circumcisions.
SEX--Foreskin actually enhances the sexual experience for men because it constantly moves over the head of the penis causing more friction and pleasure. Men will also lose much sensitivity to the glans if circumcised.
Circunsized men will have to deal with disconfot and dry glans.
The foreskin have those functions: protective, erogenous, sensory, and sexual physiologic. After all, why would you want to lose all of those “Meissner corpuscles”, the same nerve complexes which provide fine touch to the fingertips?
It is there for many reasons, that is how a man should be(it is natural).
If women like it better circumcised because it looks better(strange, not natural) or gives them more sexual pleasure(strange, not natural), then too bad, they do not have the right! All men do not like mutilated vulvas, and all men like breasts with nipples, they do not like mutilated breasts, etc, etc, etc, because that is the way those organs are supposed to be, it is natural. Interesting, isn’t?!!!
If that was a common practice to do that to baby girls, all the women would be in a big uproar about it(and men too!, men are not like women), but it’s ok to mutilate little boys. The great majority of the ones that agree with circumcision are women for their stupid selfish reasons. Even court cases reported in which mother and father fight because the mother wants to mutilate the son, it is always the mother!. You women should be ashamed to that to your son. Men that are not circumcised, will not get circumcised when adults, they would scream, kick, fight and run, if someone tries to mutilate their privates area, just like you women would run too if someone tried to do that to your labia. Men that where circumcised do not realize what they lost because never had one, and most of them that do realize try to justify it so they do not feel bad about it. Many circumcised men feel very bad emotionally because of what was done to them to such a private area.
It is mutilation of defenceless children in the most private spot, genital mutilation.
It is cruel and barbaric.
It is a human rights violation.
It is not the parent’s decision; it is the parents decision if they want to abuse him, rape him, or to kill him?.
I do not even agree that it is ok if an adult man wants to get circumcised. I think it is wrong, because if a man wants to lose a finger, the Doctor can not do that to him. Think about it, think, think. And by the way, adult men that decide to get circumcised, do it because they know most women like it, they just do it to be more accepted by women.
I think it is just like slavery and all other barbaric acts of the past, it was accepted because it was common practice or tradition, everyone accepted slavery without questioning the facts, but it is not accepted anymore in a modern and fair and civilized society. Circumcision must not be allowed, BY LAW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Many other reasons not to do it, check it out:
http://www.mothersagainstcirc.org/
http://www.cirp.org/library/treatment/phimosis/
http://www.noharmm.org/
http://www.doctorsopposingcircumcision.org/
http://www.circumcisionquotes.com/boydies.html
2006-09-10 07:39:03
·
answer #5
·
answered by miniboi6666 2
·
1⤊
0⤋