Is Bush's military agression any better than Bin Laden's terrorism?
http://www.wordsofwar.com
2006-09-09 20:53:59 · 25 answers · asked by Ronnie S 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Every one of them perfectly is doing what his role needs.
2006-09-09 21:02:27 · answer #1 · answered by Eve 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Bin Laden may have killed 3000+ considering the USS Cole and Kenya/Tanzania. He has done so well knowing that an 800lbs gorilla called the U.S. army would be unleashed on him.
Bush has killed hundreds of thousands by signing some paper. His motives were not ideological, but money. The greed for oil brought us to Iraq. What he has done (oh so half hearted) in Afghanistan is a duty they would have liked to avoid, as Rumsfelds suggestion to bomb Iraq after 9-11 stands witness to.
Bush didn't have to fear that some army is trying to hunt him down. He knew that his actions will be rewarded once he leaves office by the corporate pigs that got him into office in the first place.
Now who is the bigger terrorist?
2006-09-10 06:17:47 · answer #2 · answered by The answer man 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Bin Laden was never behind the the September bombings!
Suicide and killing innocent people is a major sin in Islam. If only the people would educate themselves and free themselves from ignorance and from political brain washing, we will no longer have slaves to the system.
Peace bro.
2006-09-10 06:47:43 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Don't use any better.
American Bush is the only bloody stupid Christain on the earth.
Bush asked to do the bloody thing and Bin Laden acted like a fool.
2006-09-10 04:05:50 · answer #4 · answered by sl_mgr 1 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Binladen wants to deliver some messages to to the whole world that all muslims in palstine.bosnia. Afganistan . Somalia and other palces arrounded the world are been attacked by other nations and people such as Israelians who kill many people in palastine evry day .. so the point is that why do Americans do`nt care for what is going in the middle east why do they supply Israel with weapons while preventing Irain from having its won weapons.
In the other hand Bush wants to stay in the white house so foolishes all the American ythat gaida is their ever lasting enemy and in the same time don`t explaine the acual reasons why all muslims and Arab hate American.
2006-09-10 04:16:08 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Bush is better because he is not hiding but leading the Americans fight the Terrorists. Bin Laden is a coward who attacks people with secret bombs and forcibly piloted places to crash on WTC towers.
2006-09-10 05:31:39 · answer #6 · answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
They're both partners so they're both same I hate them both. The 9/11 incident in which Innocent people died was a drama which was directed by Bush and starred Laden. They both deserve Oscar.
2006-09-10 04:04:30 · answer #7 · answered by suMone 1 · 1⤊ 2⤋
OK, the Bush bashing has finally gone too far. I can't stand the guy either, but you really can't compare him to someone who apparently masterminded the attack of 9/11/01. He's a creep, but he's not THAT bad a creep!
2006-09-10 04:01:53 · answer #8 · answered by auntb93again 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
The fact that anyone could even think to ask this question tells you how clueless most people are when it comes to the war on terror.
2006-09-10 04:03:10 · answer #9 · answered by loggrad98 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
if you were stranded on a island and on one side was bush and the other bin laden ....who would you be friends with ....idiot
2006-09-10 04:00:15 · answer #10 · answered by gry w 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I feel sorry for you. The inability to tell the difference makes you as broken as those who would blow themselves up among innocent people. Not necessarily as bad, but certainly as broken.
2006-09-10 04:14:39 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋