ashes in the wind is a nice story, classic like gone with the wind, as far as i know it has not become a movie yet, why not give a try for not yet movie? movafagh bashid.
2006-09-09 20:15:54
·
answer #1
·
answered by baran 1
·
1⤊
0⤋
I would remake "Superman" and set it in the fifties... I think the character works better in the "world of yesteryear." In a simpler time, a simple character like Superman works better.
It is one of the reasons why Batman and Spiderman resonate on the big screen better oday than Supes does. In a complex and conflicted world like we have today... a less omnipotent hero works better.
2006-09-10 00:38:41
·
answer #2
·
answered by baseballfan 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Gone with the wind .
Not that , it had any flaws . Just picturing it in the present scenario & making all the efforts to make it as good and genuine as the original movie and also interesting with all the spice like in the current movies .
2006-09-09 20:23:54
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I'd remake Trading Places, with Eddie Murphy. Instead of Eddie, this time I'd use Dave Chappelle.
2006-09-09 20:15:19
·
answer #4
·
answered by Jeff 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
The Outsiders. I really wish they'd remake that movie for today's generation.
2006-09-09 21:11:16
·
answer #5
·
answered by Skye 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
I see this as an attempt to make buckets of money on a similar time as on the comparable time attempting to make infants into Beatles followers. on a similar time as Disney and Robert Zemeckis the two make very alluring youngster's video clips, i do no longer see Yellow Submarine as something i'd take my childrens to make certain. as much as now as crass commercialism is in touch- i do no longer see this undertaking as being to any extent further suitable or any worse than the different action pictures that featured Beatles songs. "Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts club Band," which blanketed a lot of celebrities of the late '70s, substitute into so undesirable it substitute into sturdy. "around the Universe" substitute into contrived, yet exciting. something to remember with reference to the unique "Yellow Submarine:" the Beatles did no longer do the voices for the characters. Granted, the movie featured various Beatles songs, and the score substitute into composed via George Martin (who no longer in basic terms produced the Beatles, yet did an outstanding variety of the orchestration of their songs). on a similar time as the Beatles did make a short cameo on the top of the movie, they did no longer write it, nor did they do any of the artwork for the movie. to totally delight in the unique movie, you will desire to shop it contained in the context of the late '60s. My end: i'm constructive the remake would be stunning and human beings will pass see it, yet i do no longer see it as transforming into a classic or iconic movie.
2016-09-30 13:05:22
·
answer #6
·
answered by vanderbilt 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think it would be "The Wolfman". Dracula might be my first choice but it has been done again and again and sometimes very well. I think the whole man changing into monster under the full moon still has a lot of potential.
2006-09-09 20:17:52
·
answer #7
·
answered by San Diego Art Nut 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Halloween. The movie is a horror classic, I would maybe just like a little more character background on Micheal Myers. Find out why he did it, what made him do it.
2006-09-09 20:26:48
·
answer #8
·
answered by eman1205 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
GoldenEye with James Bond in India and China
2006-09-09 20:19:15
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Phantasm
2006-09-09 20:58:53
·
answer #10
·
answered by Brian 3
·
0⤊
0⤋