answer each question one at a time and do so honestly.
do you stand for rape?
do you like being lied to by some who will do anything to get what he wants?
do you support war criminals?
do you wilfully accept the breech of your constitutional rights?
do you support those in breech of federal laws?
2006-09-09 19:55:03 · 21 answers · asked by sikn_shadow_420 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
then how can you support bush?
(rape and murder of innocent women and children at the hands of american soldiers is a daily occurance in iraq, these are the people bush claims he wants to liberate, yet, these crimes go unpunished. the supreme court ruled that he had commited seval war crimes and breeched federal laws by going into iraq against the UN's ruling, he claimed there where wmd's but the only weapons found where outdated and incapacitated, he lied to his people and they turn the other cheek, he controls the population by means of terrorism. he breeched the your constitutional rights.
need i say more? EMPEACH!)
2006-09-09 19:55:13 · update #1
then how can you support bush?
(rape and murder of innocent women and children at the hands of american soldiers is a daily occurance in iraq, these are the people bush claims he wants to liberate, yet, these crimes go unpunished. the supreme court ruled that he had commited seval war crimes and breeched federal laws by going into iraq against the UN's ruling, he claimed there where wmd's but the only weapons found where outdated and incapacitated, he lied to his people and they turn the other cheek, he controls the population by means of terrorism. he breeched the your constitutional rights.
need i say more? IMPEACH!)
2006-09-09 19:55:24 · update #2
No one stands for murder. Everyone has to admit we have a right to self defense, and if that means we have to kill (justifiable) then it does. It is a tough world. No sin to kill in self-defense though.
We generally define rape and the forcible sexual relations and without consent. Arabs define rape as searching the burkas for bombs and weapons even when search is carried out by women. Are you an Arab? Or a Christian? Do you know what your values even are?
I appreciate that Bush is using every tool at his lawful disposal to defend our country in this war that was declared on us. Since when did it become unlawful to misdirect the enemy? Are you the enemy that must be misdirected in order for the defense of our country to go forward?
I do not believe that those risking their lives in our defense are committing war crimes and demand strict proof before anyone should be allowed to make that accusation.
The only regular breach of my constitutional rights that occurs now are the anti-gun Rosie O'Donnell left wing that would deny us the right to self defense and to bear arms in this defense.
You mean the tax laws? Like Mark Rich and Qualcomm and the Clinton pardons I'm sure. Nope, don';t support that, don't support the taxes either, but think everyone should be excused from unjust taxes, not just the in crowd at the DNC.
2006-09-09 20:20:14 · answer #1 · answered by frankie59 4 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Of course not.
Of course not.
No.
No.
No.
No.
Okay, first of all, the rape and murder of women does NOT happen every day in Iraq. There have been a few isolated incidents. You know why? Because we have an ALL-VOLUNTEER military, and because there's immorality in society, there's going to be immorality in the military as well.
President Bush does NOT condone those actions. Just because they happened under him doesn't mean that it's his fault.
Kennedy started the Viet Nam war, and Johnson continued it. While it was going on, there were a few of the same kind of incidents. Does that mean Kennedy and Johnson were at fault?
I don't even think you're going to read all this, because I think you're still stuck on high-school mode, but I'm going to do it anyway. I'm only getting started. If you don't want a dose of reality, then pick your bong back up and ignore this. But if you DO, keep reading.
The US is a sovereign nation. Going to the UN was a FORMALITY. We do not need anyone's permission to attack another country.
Besides, ever hear of the "Food for Oil" scandal? I bet you have, and you just ignored it. THAT'S why the UN wouldn't back us. Most of the countries in the UN (the ones that refused to help us) were in Hussein's pocket. Of COURSE they didn't want to go to war with Iraq.
The problem with ANY WMD's (whether they were outdated or not) being found in Iraq is that Hussein WAS NOT allowed to have them. Period. It was decreed with the cease-fire agreement at the end of the Gulf War that he was not allowed to have ANY form of WMD's, whether chemical, biological, or nuclear. He was not allowed to attempt to obtain them. He wasn't even allowed to THINK about getting them.
If he would lie about FOUR HUNDRED "unserviceable" WMD's, what else would he lie about?
Our president DID NOT lie. If he did, then so did a very long list of Senators and members of Congress. So I guess we should impeach all of them. We went with the intelligence available at the time. Nothing wrong with that.
President Bush has NOT breached our Constitutional rights. Oh, you're talking about the "warrantless" wire-tapping, right? Well, guess what. There are PROVISIONS in the Constitution that give the federal government the right to withhold certain rights for the welfare of all people. Study it. You'll find them. This is not the first time methods like these have been used.
We were attacked, remember? We've been under attack since 1979. It's about damn TIME something was done.
Suspending habeas corpus is NOT unconstitutional and it is NOT unprecedented. If you knew anything about history, you would know this.
This is also not the first time "warrantless" wire-tapping has been used.
I'm sorry, but if it was a choice between the discomfort of a few, versus the lives of hundreds of thousands, I would choose the discomfort of a few.
Hey, isn't that what FDR did after Pearl Harbor was attacked? Why, yes it is! And he was one of the best presidents our nation has ever had!
Do yourself a favor. Read some non-partisan books about history (no Michael Moore, and no Ann Coulter), and you'll see that EVERYTHING I have stated here is true. That is, if you no longer want to be ignorant.
Otherwise, just stick to your bong, because I have the feeling that's about all you know.
2006-09-10 03:27:29 · answer #2 · answered by The_Cricket: Thinking Pink! 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Bush doesn't support crimes against civilians. Crimes against civilians do get punished. Infact the death penalty is going to be given to some soldiers that killed civilians.
The UN found that Iraq WAS in violation of their pact but was unwilling to take action. They wanted to have sanctions against Iraq. The US and many other nations like Britain, Australia, Germany, Poland, Brazil, France, and many others attacked Iraq. The US stayed behind to clean up the mess and take the heat.
My friend that just returned from Iraq told me that they found TONS of evidence that they were making WMD and had obviously moved them possibly out of country. He was on one of the teams activly searching for them.
In addition the majority of the weapons that were found, though were old, were still quite lethal and could have been used against other countries. Those were weapons that iraq did HIDE and didn't disclose to the UN.
Iraq was guilty as hell of many things including using wmd against people in thier OWN COUNTRY. They were guilty of torture and terrorism amoung other heineous crimes.
2006-09-10 03:05:14 · answer #3 · answered by sshazzam 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
do you really believe this is the first or last (if we get rid of bush like you want) rape and murder will be done in the name of this country-wake up man war is hell ,look at Atlanta in1864 and that was americans raping american WOMEN. it is horrible but it is going to happen.ok he lied ,again is he first president to lie to public to get us into war,NO .All your points have some validity but pragmatisim dictates our actions once war is begun.lastly why waste time posting on here when a hand written thoughtful letter to President BUSH would mean so much more,just write like an adult and express your viewpoint-
2006-09-10 03:16:55 · answer #4 · answered by badmts 4 · 5⤊ 0⤋
No to all.... and I haven't lost any freedoms or rights.... Muslims should be losing freedoms and rights.... they have brought ignorance and murder to the world... and they support it...
Bush is our president... like the clinton thing was our president
and, Muslims brought all of the responses upon themselves....
Muslims have yet to speak out in public against Muslim terrorism in the name of ideology of Islam....
Muslims have yet to show they worship a religion of peace instead of an ideology of hate and intolerance...
This war is not about Bush, it is about the survival of the world... will it continue to advance... or will it descend into the cesspool of darkness and retreat backwards because of the ignorance of Islamic ideology....
2006-09-10 03:28:27 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I am against all the things you mentioned so I guess it's good that Bill Clinton and Ted Kennedy are not the President at this time.
I love GWB and am happy he and our troops are protecting you while you write this garbage on this site!
2006-09-10 03:13:57 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
1 extreme to the other. Bush didn't outright murder anyone, didn't outright rape anyone.....etc.
You are using general social dislikes to gain people in favor of your beliefs. You misrepresented your question to this public, when only to slanderize someone in the added comments. I say we should impeach you.
2006-09-10 03:36:09 · answer #7 · answered by lildarlinkristisue 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
You are making a lot of unsubstantiated assumptions in this "question"....but the is the USA and you are allowed to do so.
I for one, thin you are an idiot and I hope some military folk re-align you, soon.
2006-09-10 03:33:09 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
another bush hater.
bush will not be in office after 2 years.you guys will have to find someone to hate.
maybe you already did.YOURSELF.
rape and murder everyday?what are you watching? al-jazeera?
grow up man,do you think all of us would keep quiet if its really happening?don't cite me that one case.
one case out of thousands of troops.and guys are on trail don't forget that.
do you know what would happen if thousands of their troops were here?.
controls the population?, i sure hope he gives you a vasectomy, we don't need more of you running around.
2006-09-10 03:14:47 · answer #9 · answered by anuneha31 3 · 5⤊ 0⤋
no I prefer to be supine.
And you have any "proof" there is rape everyday by US troops of innocent women and childre nor is that just speculation on your part?
And last I heard the guys that raped and murdered the girl and her family in Iraq are facing the death penalty.
Your light bulb is dimming again.
2006-09-10 03:00:10 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋