All of you people out there going on about this and that and everything else in the government, have you never read a history book.
Take Watergate for example. Do you think Nixon was the only person to do something like this, and just how bad was that.
Take the Whitewater scandal and the mysterious death of Vince Foster, I believe it was, and all of the people who couldn't for a second believe that the Clintons had that man killed.
And yet conservatives were sure of it, and liberals said that was madness. Now the liberal goes on about all of the sh*t surrounding Bush and the conservative is sure he is lilly white.
Throughout history, it has been seen after the fact that men in power exercise no restraint in their machinations, and yet everyone is all in shock and horror to hear that there might have been some seedy dealings in government.
Are you a retard? Are you naive?
I mean you personally, dumb*ss!
HAHAHAHAHA !!!!!!!!
2006-09-09
18:41:54
·
24 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics
i know its all bullsh*t but most people don't. they keep arguing and fighting for nothing really. how sad
2006-09-09 18:49:39
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
What a word to use. I HATE that word and all that it implies.
Why?
I work with the developmentally and physically disabled, and they fight against that word every day of their lives. Why? Because it implies STUPIDITY (isn't that the reason you used the word)! It is a crass and ignorant word, and anyone that uses it as an insult is just as much of a dumb@$$ as the ones they are using it against.
Grow up. And expand your vocabulary. Need some other words?
stupid
ignorant
uneducated
moron
dumb@$$
ignoramus
unintelligent
slow
unimaginative
(In other words, get a thesaurus)
To your question: History, current events and opinions are meant to be debated. Some may be a little judgemental in their debates, but that is what is going on. People are expressing what they know, what they feel, and their opinion on things. Many happenings are opened to interpratation and view point, and many know that. Three people can look at one thing and get three different answers for what happened - even with the same information. So passing judgement on someone's opinion is a very moot point.
You know so much? Fine. Great. Have a party. Raise the flags. Wave the banners. Sing it from the roof tops. But don't call others names for what they state.
2006-09-10 02:49:45
·
answer #2
·
answered by volleyballchick (cowards block) 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I see your point but am unable to agree with you because your approach negates the possibility of me doing so. Things have changed, technology is much more advanced and loyalty in politics isn't what it used to be. I'm sure a Kennedy did what Clinton did but was it all over the news everyday? No. I am not against the possibility but I think in today's world it is quite a bit more difficult to get away with anything when you are in a position of power. These days a president must have culpable deniability......which doesn't exactly let everyone they know off the hook....say someone not so under the microscope....
2006-09-10 02:00:05
·
answer #3
·
answered by frogspeaceflower 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I've never gotten it myself. As long as someone's from their party, they can do no wrong. That's why I don't see who's better, because often there is no better man, hasn't been one since decades before I was born. Nowadays, the job is to find who's worse and vote for his opposition, but with Bush in office I'm beginning to assume people want the former.
2006-09-10 01:46:27
·
answer #4
·
answered by Huey Freeman 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
A soapbox politician in the flesh! I thought your kind were extinct. You are one of these people who rant and rave about this or that obscure political conspiracy on your battered soapbox, then you go home and read the newspapers to find some more grist for your conspiracy mill. What a load of codswallop!!
2006-09-10 02:14:34
·
answer #5
·
answered by Scabius Fretful 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
If you want to make a point make it...and I assure you there are many here who are far more intelligent and more aware of political history than you are and will ever be...your own writing as made that abundantly clear.
Humble your self..be quiet and learn!
2006-09-10 01:53:31
·
answer #6
·
answered by dstr 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
My.my..arent we a bit fast in our assumptions?Anyone who is aware of our government knows its a seedy world in which they deal..some have gotten busted others have not,not sure which of the two are the dumbest..do you? =)
2006-09-10 01:47:24
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
America has **** all history i could learn it in a day try fighting an 800 year war your the one naive you prick
2006-09-10 01:48:02
·
answer #8
·
answered by iwanpalmer 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
One out of three people is a retartd, look to your left and look to your right if you don't see a retard de dee de your a retard--Carlos Mencina
2006-09-10 01:49:04
·
answer #9
·
answered by corvuequis 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
well if we have nothing but crimminals and scandalous, corrupt me running our country then it doesn't say much for our system of government. It makes you wonder if the political system we are using is failing us.
2006-09-10 01:47:11
·
answer #10
·
answered by one glove 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Every ones someone else's dumb*ss!
2006-09-10 01:47:35
·
answer #11
·
answered by frenchfriedfrogslegs 2
·
0⤊
0⤋