We're the evil ones, not them. We should focus on fighting bigger evil like banning the Bible and preventing blacks from succeeding. The Pope is a fascist, man. Also, the corperations are tricking YOU into working for THEM. I envision a new society. You know, a place like where people live together and like, provide services for each other in exchange for their services?
2006-09-09
16:04:11
·
25 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Government
Christianity is the most evil institution in the whole world man.
2006-09-09
16:10:23 ·
update #1
Seriously, you guys wouldn't know irony if it bit you in the a*s.
2006-09-09
16:11:39 ·
update #2
You guys are seriously retarded if you can't even recognize the most obvious sarcasm.
2006-09-09
16:15:12 ·
update #3
Either you are on crack and meth at the same time, or you have just written some pretty good hyperboylic satire.
2006-09-09 16:37:19
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
You seem to have lost your balance and coming out with such a question and then the explanation.
You consider all to be evils, abusing a religion and attacking a religious head - the Pope. To make things worse you are thinking of a new society with liking for each other.
Your fundamentals are not correct. For such a society you ought to consider all human beings as divine and show religious tolerance. Respect for other would bring in the base for the society you are contemplating. Bible is a holy book and provides guidance and enlightens millions of believers. Those fundamentals are to be kept intact and should be enriched.
The society you are thinking to build should provide for these terrorists, how they are to be brought under the fold so that your vision and thinking gets an upliftment. You can let alone those terrorists but they would not let you do it. So the society of your vision has to provide for those fellows who are against the humanity and ideals of religion have to be used to achieve the task.
2006-09-10 21:03:19
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
My vison is the same as yours.
I wrote this about the British government, but it could just as easily apply to America also.
The present method of governing Britain is out of date
My idea is that we need a complete revamp in government. Not just change the people, but completely change the way we think about government.
When the current system of democracy was created the population of England was about a sixth of what it is now. So there were 659 MPs for about 10 million people, being a representation ratio of about 15000 to 1.
Now, we have 646 MPs, and about 60 million people giving a representation factor of about 93,000 to one.
So each person's representation has reduced by around 600%.
In other words, you now get about one sixth of the representation that a citizen in 1801 got. Another way of looking at this is to say that, in order to have the same level of representation that we had in 1801, we would need 3876 MPs.
This is obviously ludicrous. and is absolute evidence of a need for a change.
As the population has increased so dramatically, then the effectiveness and fairness of a central government has reduced.
What we now need is an increase in the power of local government, and a reduction in the power of central government.
I propose that we should bring back something akin to the parish councils. We should have constituencies of a maximum of 500 families. These constituencies should have total control over the lives of its constituents, with no interference from outside, They must provide all of their own facilities such as school, health care, pensions, police, ar anything which they feel that they need.
If they feel that they are too small for a particular project or service, then they negotiate with nearby constituencies to make suitable arrangements. There would be no higher level arbitrator. Full responsibility would rest at the local level.
The benefits of this are enormous. Firstly, everybody would know everybody else within a constituency, so when a problem arises it would be easy to get to the source, because it would be to everyone's benefit to do so. This alone would reduce terrorism and serious crime to a minimum. A sort of neighbourhood watch scheme in which everybody takes full part, and makes the decisions. The money presently spent on taxes, most of which disappears in red tape, civil servants' and MPs' salaries, waging war, and hundreds of other expenses from which the average citizen receives no benefit whatsoever, would be spent on directly benefiting the community, on projects voted for by the community.
It is most likely that taxes could be reduced to a fraction of what is presently paid, because all wastage would be readily identified. Everybody would participate in their own government, because they would be able to understand it, and would have a real voice.
There would be no need for secret services, or secrets of any kind, saving another fortune, and removing another load of confusion.
I'm sure you can identify many other benefits, and I'm also sure that any disadvantages could quickly be overcome.
2006-09-10 00:12:37
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
How are WE evil. Are we blowing up people because they don't want to convert? No. Misunderstood my ***, they know what they want. They are evil, hitler like people. I can't believe a scum like you would drag the Bible into this, and the Pope. Maybe if blacks stopped following gangs and stop whining for the government to help them, maybe they would succeed. Go ask any successful black man how he became wow he is. Have you ever noticed that most of the people who read and follow the Bible are law abiding citizens? If we don't work for the corporations, how are we gonna make money? "They are tricking you". Bull ****, I have never had a corporation come to my door and say "you must work for us". Your system makes no sense, and based on this question, and this type of question can say a lot about a person, you are an uneducated person, who doesn't know what is good for you, let alone the country. May God have mercy on any poor person who knows you, and I thank God I ain't one of them.
2006-09-09 16:14:31
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Yeah, we should feel the terrorists pain, ban evil corporations from hiring poor innocent people, jail anyone who promotes peace and religion, and just get along with everbody else and the whole world will be perfect. I am not sure what to do with the blacks though, maybe we could make them work for the evil corporations, just as long as they don't hit the glass ceilings.
2006-09-10 02:35:26
·
answer #5
·
answered by kimba 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
when you go to the dr next, you need to tell him/her to change you medicine because it is effecting your reasoning.
i loathe bushole. i despise what legislations the simple minded right wing shoved thru.
BUT
I FIND YOUR POSITION RIDICULOUS., poorly thought out and hopefully a result of youthful folly.
if we put down blacks the economy would take a big hit, and probably lead to a depression.
the roman catholic church historically as been oppressive to the peasant, today if it hasn't mended it's ways, is well on its way.
if you went to a trade society, how do you think you will pay for electricity? gasoline? computers?
utopian wishes are age old, but not practical in todays first world countries.
if you wish to do this at least go to an emerging ec onomy where such ideas may work.
2006-09-09 16:12:57
·
answer #6
·
answered by elmo o 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
Why is there such a contridiction in your question? Are you an idiot?
Ban the Bible and bash the blacks followed by you invisioning a place where people live together and exchange and provide services.
Did you read this question before you posted it?
2006-09-09 16:10:00
·
answer #7
·
answered by LeAnne 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
o read your other question about sarcasm...strangely enoguh,i agree. however i do believe that christianity is a tool for bloodshed and ignorance. as a black,i dont mind not suceeding.as long i i can wear metal in my mouth.also i wipe my *** with the bible daily...im on the book of matthew.
luckily the lord never shut up.
2006-09-09 16:27:28
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I feel we (USA) are moving to a more just society.
The Democrats wrote, "It is a fight for Freedom." The President said, "I know how to make you freer" and "We need to ring the liberty bell."
The Jewish/Americans and Hispanic/Americans might just beat them Anglos for once.
Also if you look at the new money it doesn't say, "In god we trust" anymore. Granted it probably should say, "We trust in you" because lets face facts here your one smart cookie and you have some great ideas...so please do US all a favor and keep up the good work! Thank you.
2006-09-09 16:21:59
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
I am sick of hearing about how bad we treat the so called poor misunderstood terrorist. how many innocent people have the terrorist killed. And how many have they beheaded because they don`t like something that someone said. Or something that some one did. why should i feel sorry for some terrorist that would kill me if He/She got the chance. just because i don`t believe in the same thing that He/She dose. or because i don`t have the same kind of faith HE/She dose. and because i am not. Muslim
P.S. If you don`t believe in a Religion why don`t go tell the terrorist that. And see how long the terrorist will let you live.
2006-09-09 17:09:52
·
answer #10
·
answered by timothy b 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
Aha! a fellow anarchist.
Unfortunately, anarchy will never work, either.
We had better stick to hunting down the control freaks.
Come to think of it, didn't the old-time anarchists go around blowing things up?
I would probably lose my hands or maybe my life if I ever tried to build a bomb.
2006-09-09 16:13:55
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋