bush cannot escape his brown skidmark on US history
2006-09-09 15:16:48 · 24 answers · asked by bush-deathgrip 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Historians, I am sure will designate the Iraq war, and the overall war on terror to be a massive failure on par with Vietnam. Granted many will state that the death toll between Vietnam , the Iraq war, and the overall war on terror doesn’t even compare, as if that somehow sanitizes the inanity and immorality of our misguided actions. To state that American soldier’s, and foreign civilians deaths don’t equal the number dead in Vietnam is to trivialize human life, as if it were just a statistic to be used for political ends. Ultimately, Vietnam was a misguided, and Iraq and the war on terrorism are misguided as well. I doubt historians will ever deem it a LAUGHABLE DISASTER, for juxtaposing those two terms together is an oxymoron. A disaster, where innocent human life has been sacrificed, can never be considered laughable, despite how laughable the “intellect” of our Commander and Chief is who helmed this fiasco. The only thing laughable about this is the level of shame Bush will have as he heads out of office, and how much he has tarnished the reputation of his own party.
By the way, speaking of oxymoron; you committed another one by calling this a "CHRISTIAN WAR". There is nothing Christian about a preemptive attack on a nation that did not attack you. This is not a Christian war; it is an act of profiteering and stupidity.
2006-09-09 15:26:52 · answer #1 · answered by Lawrence Louis 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yeah, the sham -crusader.
It will never be recorded as a 'Christian war'. Period.
War is always a massive failure and never a LAUGHABLE disaster
2006-09-09 15:31:36 · answer #2 · answered by Soledad Mendez 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
The war and the whole Bush legacy will be one of complete and utter failure. He has screwed up every job that he has ever had. This includes the presidency. He will be known as the only coke snorting, alcoholic with no morals to be appointed to the presidency.
2006-09-09 15:22:37 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
i do not discover it laughable, i stumble upon it tragic that the chief of this united states refuses to allow study on stem cells which will in no way develop into people, yet will be discarded, and that would want to provide wish to those affected by countless diseases presently, and cites moral grounds for this stance, yet might want to quibble over the definition of torture. i wager its situational morality.
2016-11-25 22:52:54 · answer #4 · answered by laramee 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Neither ,you stupid liberal. The only brown skid mark on us history is the Democrat party as it exists today. You should be ashamed of yourself for betraying your country & perpetuating the enemies propaganda. You are probably another hateful Muslim piece of sh*t.
2006-09-09 15:25:56 · answer #5 · answered by Steven B 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
There is nothing laughable about a disaster
2006-09-09 15:25:07 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
There is nothing Christian about Bush's optional war.
I believe history will record George W. Bush as the worst president in US history.
2006-09-09 15:19:37 · answer #7 · answered by arvis3 4 · 5⤊ 3⤋
christian war? i would say about a massive failure as your stupid question. and just for the record......... i am sticking up for bush, not for christianity
2006-09-09 15:24:08 · answer #8 · answered by lc_firefighter 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
both
he is a skidmark himself just like his dad
we should use some bleach and get rid of the skidmark on american underpants
2006-09-09 15:23:21 · answer #9 · answered by dudeman 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋
That would depend solely on whether or not humanity will even be around 100 years from now.
2006-09-09 15:22:36 · answer #10 · answered by Tofu Jesus 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋