Wait until the ACLU hears about this case.
2006-09-09 14:29:02
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I agree with the school board. It is a disgusting fad for boys pants to be so low. Hopefully the girls in this school won't follow this same fad. It would have been stopped long ago if that were the case. It is a form of exhibition, and schools should have the right to stop it.
2006-09-09 14:54:17
·
answer #2
·
answered by tobinmbsc 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
dude if this is actual then this is basically incorrect. i do no longer purely like the comprehensive saggies yet um... loose us of a??? I propose what some people like others might locate offensive ex: short mini skirts or ripped grunge denims. next no sideways hats, then no piercings, then no sideburns longer than a million/2 an inch... I propose the place do you draw the line? Wait i comprehend, you do no longer. in spite of the fact that people prefer to gown, as long as they DO have outfits on, should not be any of the governments employer.
2016-11-07 00:17:56
·
answer #3
·
answered by rangnow 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
i geuss he is against swimsuit models too or perhaps we should pick what he has to wear like some trash bag head to toe with only two holes for his eyes cuz if he is ashamed of seeing cloth then he must not not need respectable clothes or respect that hey least they are dressed or sayin hey god created these things we call bodies and im not ashamed but hes like ashamed so that makes me like ashamed of him and i just wouldnt wanna see any part of him and if someone who prefures baggy pants and he sees that the cloth is like filthy dirty soiled he should be kind enough to say something for those to put on clean clothes and whipe better or wash their butt yet leave the others alone cause at least they are clean and cloth is covering there anus and if thats where his attention goes and it bothers him maybe he has gay tendencies and is easely tempted to those thoughts and perhaps he dont get the attention someguys do and he hasnt jumpt from one chick to the next to understand that they might as well leave em down far enough for the next frontal hopper and he dont get that kind of luck so hes like jealous or somethin and lookin in the wrong place
2006-09-09 14:52:19
·
answer #4
·
answered by freikeygee@sbcglobal.net 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
While I really don't understand the fascination that people have about running around with their pants hanging around their lower thighs, I also don't think this is something that our public officials should be spending their time with.
I think that the rest of society should take it upon ourselves to ***** slap the little "gangstas" into reality.
2006-09-09 14:34:47
·
answer #5
·
answered by troythom 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
I want to know how they keep their pants on if they are hanging past their butts? Doesn't gravity play any part in this? Or do they wear special anti-gravity pants?
2006-09-09 14:32:06
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
It doesn't matter anyway to me, bro. I don't know any classic female who finds that attractive anyway, and I don't wear my pants like that so it wouldn't make me angry.
2006-09-09 14:44:24
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
which is it, baggy pants or indecent exposure... i could see why they would be argueing for indecent exposure (underwear), even though i'm undecided on whether i agree with it, but of course they won't ban baggy pants, as your question implies.
2006-09-09 14:33:27
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Oh, please. They can't tell people how to dress! What about freedom of choosing what you want to wear???
2006-09-09 16:18:16
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋