LOVE YOUR NEIGHBOUR BUT THE WORLD FIGHT FOR PEACE.WHY NOT FOR LOVE!
2006-09-09 14:25:02 · 11 answers · asked by Hephzibah I 1 in Social Science ➔ Other - Social Science
There's a lot more love out there than there is hate. Love makes for poor headlines, though.
2006-09-09 14:30:48 · answer #1 · answered by 4999_Basque 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You'll generally find that the love that religious leaders are talking about is not, on the whole, sexual love. This is the only explanation why anyone could possibly try to argue that the Song of Songs in the Old Testament is not erotic poetry, but an allegory about the love of the believer for the Church.
When religious leaders talk about love, they usually mean love for the church (by which I mean their religious institution, not the building they pray in). The saying 'love is blind' generally refers to the fact that people will often forgive faults in people they love that they wouldn't forgive if they didn't love the people concerned.
The same is true for the love religious people sometimes feel for their church. If your church gives you all the answers, of course you're going to forgive it if it slips up now and again. However, to those of us who don't believe, the church's demand for love is a thoroughly unhealthy thing, since few churches are willing to accept criticism from their own flock. It's the same as seeing a couple you know in a disastrous relationship; they shouldn't be in it, but they don't want to hear you say so.
2006-09-09 14:42:35 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
the guy who loves, for without it, there may be no stress of charm between the two, human(s) and/or God, which we call love... Love is the comprehensive stress, the different is the beginning, and the objective, Alpha and Omega and so on. One is the charm to the symbolism in letters, the different is all the writing, and extra fairly the areas in between, and lined with the help of, the understanding - to apply classic Christian words. God bless.
2016-11-07 00:17:50 · answer #3 · answered by rangnow 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The argument has to lie in the definition of 'Love.'
Not sure about the bottom line of you 'piece' here - because it lacks any punctuation I'm not sure what you are trying to say without the bending of rules which govern the dictate of your diatribesk for which I request a reconcile from thee
Sash.
2006-09-13 10:54:11 · answer #4 · answered by sashtou 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The world we perceive is but an illusion. Its function is to maintain our belief in the separation, and thus to support our belief in fear's guidance, instead of love's. War is not based upon hatred, but rather, upon fear, and it is fear, not hate, which is love's true opposite. Thus you cannot fight a war for love.
2006-09-09 16:46:11 · answer #5 · answered by eric l 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
NO love can see feel hear thats the only truth
2006-09-09 14:46:34 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Most wars are about economic gain, however they dress it up with excuses. Concerning war, it's not about who is right but who is left.
2006-09-09 14:34:00 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
apparently love is deaf as well as blind
2006-09-09 15:11:14 · answer #8 · answered by Icarus 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
don't live your life by the bible full of contradictions YOU are love in this life
2006-09-10 04:59:11 · answer #9 · answered by q6656303 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
whew! heavy question....and i think peace IS an aspect of love....
2006-09-09 14:33:48 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋