Radio waves and visible light are both forms of electromagnetic energy. So are infrared, ultraviolet, microwaves, x-rays, and gamma rays.
But you can't focus radio waves with a glass lens. Glass affects only a certain range of frequencies, and it doesn't affect them all to the same degree.
Here's an introduction to the electromagnetic spectrum:
http://imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/science/know_l1/emspectrum.html
JMB
2006-09-09 12:55:18
·
answer #1
·
answered by levyrat 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes, same thing (electromagnetic radiation), different frequencies (and wavelengths) for example, your FM car radio receives signals with a wavelength around 4 metes (very roughly) in length. Visible light is 400 to 700 nanometers in wavelength (nanometers are 1/1,000,000,000 meters, 1/10,000,000 millimeters in length). Could you focus radio waves with a magnifying class? I have two answers: yes, but due to the extreme length of the wavelengths (compared with what the glass is designed to focus), you would not be able to note the change in focus. No, because the glass lacks the properties of being active at the frequency and wavelength specified. (really, the same answer, from two different approaches)
2006-09-09 13:13:51
·
answer #2
·
answered by n8sua 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
i don't know is the quick answer yet i imagine P&S is the acceptable type to homestead the WTF sub type. lol I have heard that as individuals of the favourite public, we are entitled to flag down passing police vehicles at every time and the police might want to oblige on your quizzical investigations. i'll neither substantiate or perhaps keep in mind the position I heard this so i'd not try it basically incase it replaced into expertise dispersed with the help of Nutters nameless. ;) i know for undeniable reality that each human being highway customers might want to adhere to the speed minimize and that particular rules keep on with outdoors colleges. My stepson replaced into knocked down many years in the past popping out of faculty. He suddenly met the line from behind an illegally parked vehicle (on the yellow zig-zags). by our stress aided with the help of the community newspaper we were in a position to get a zebra crossing, more desirable railings outdoors the faculty and there replaced into even a marketing campaign no call and shame motorists who were said parking on the yellow zig zags. The sources replaced into later declared a blanket 20 mph % minimize to further minimise destiny incidents. fortuitously my stepson made an total fix from a damaged leg because the vehicle that struck him replaced into surely travelling about 25 mph. Had the vehicle been at any more desirable %., the incident may were very much more desirable severe.
2016-11-25 22:41:28
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, the frequency is in the MHz range, meaning the wavelength is too short to be diffracted with a regular lens. To focus radio waves, one would need a parabolic 'mirror'.
2006-09-09 13:25:28
·
answer #4
·
answered by pegez 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
NO the waves are similar but not the same. To focus radio waves with tuned antennas.
2006-09-09 12:48:53
·
answer #5
·
answered by JOHNNIE B 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I would say in theory that would be possible but in order to do such a thing it would take an awfully large magnifying glass to receive radio waves with.
2006-09-09 12:49:48
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anthony D 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Light is far too complex. The formula of Einstein was rubbish. He didn't know what matter is and what light is. Yes indeed light has wave length and pehaps photons. But then there is much more to light. You can't make three dimensional pictures with radiowave. You may make static pictures but not real 3 D color pictures. Light is also used for guidance and light and matter are interwoven but not by mc2.
2006-09-09 13:04:54
·
answer #7
·
answered by pathowiz 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
Of course you can. But the lens size would need to be bigger. Actually, if you have a rooftop television antenna, most of the cross-members are actually lens elements to focus the signal on the element which is electrically connected.
2006-09-09 13:15:36
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋