I'm no conspiracy theorist by any means, I just thought it was pretty convenient that it happened to land in a rural, non-populated area. Plus Bush authorized the military to shoot a plane down if it was threatening enough. Does anyone know of any websites that explain this theory and offer evidence for or against it?
2006-09-09 12:25:28 · 13 answers · asked by billysimas 3 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
Just go to Google Search and type in "United Flight 93." You will find a host of sites about what happened that day from all different perspectives.
....and yes, one does NOT have to believe in conspiracies to have unanswered questions, DESPITE so-called "official" reports on the matter.
As for another answerer, it still makes a difference here five years later, and again, DESPITE so-called "Official" findings.
In fact., many questions remain unanswered about the events of that fateful day....
One must admit that it is rather difficult to believe everything you have read, seen and heard about the events of that day, especially since our government has lied about so many other things.......,
Still......
Murder will out
It always has.
2006-09-09 12:49:38 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
No it was not. On September 11, 2001, the aircraft on the flight was one of four planes hijacked as part of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks. It was the only one of the four planes that did not reach its intended target, instead crashing in an empty field just outside Shanksville, Pennsylvania, about 150 miles (240 km) northwest of Washington, D.C. The 9/11 Commission (through testimony, tapes of passengers' phone calls, and the flight data recorders recovered from the crash) determined that crew and passengers, alerted through phone calls to loved ones, attempted to subdue the hijackers. The Commission concluded that the hijackers crashed the plane to keep the crew and passengers from gaining control. The Commission's official report states that pilot LeRoy Homer, flight attendants CeeCee Lyles and Sandra Bradshaw and passengers Todd Beamer, Mark Bingham, Tom Burnett, Andrew Garcia, Jeremy Glick, and Richard Guadagno, among others, fought back against the hijackers.
2006-09-09 12:31:12 · answer #2 · answered by rltouhe 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, I truly believe this is a fact. How could 4 planes be missing from radar, 2 having already crashed into the WTC, and the military not be on high alert!!!!! Of course this fact would be too much for the American public to grasp, but I think that was the way it happened and there was no other choice.
2006-09-10 11:36:05 · answer #3 · answered by gardengeek58 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
If it substitute into shot via a missile i've got confidence investigators would have stumbled on remains of explosives scattered around the debris of the airplane and there would have been sparkling evidence of a missile penetration or explosion hollow contained in the airplane debris. And if i'm no longer incorrect, Flight ninety 3 substitute into hijacked via 4 Islamic terrorists and that they might have crashed the airplane. And it extremely is ordinary contained in the situations of a airplane hijack that militia combatants would be scambled to stay with the airplane, in basic terms ultimately motel whilst it extremely is shown that the hijacked airplane is going to crash at a populated or significant section then would they hearth, this would sound inhumane whether it relatively is going to keep extra lives.
2016-09-30 12:46:28 · answer #4 · answered by erlebach 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You better dig deep for this one. Flight 93 landed at Cleveland's Hopkins airport. It was taken to a special hanger and then the passengers were deplaned. What happened to them after that is the mystery, but one thing is for sure, Flight 93 was again seen landing in Chicago. Check the tower logs and interview the air traffic controllers at Hopkins (if you can find them). In Shanksville (as well as at the Pentagon) there is no (none) evidence that a plane crash occurred. Not a single piece of wreckage, county coroners found not a single body part, or for that matter, after many site inspections, not a single drop of blood. Have you seen plane wreckage site crashes before, you see pieces of plane throughout these crash sites. Where was the fuselage? It disintegrated? yeah right!
2006-09-09 23:34:04 · answer #5 · answered by opsaop 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
I believe it happened just like they say it did,crashing when the brave passengers and crew fought back.The military planes were on the way with the orders to shoot it down if needed,but they didn't get there before the crash.
2006-09-09 15:40:54 · answer #6 · answered by stellablue1959 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No I don't. And to pose such a question diminishes the bravery of the passengers in trying to wrest control of the plane back from the hijackers. And to ask it 2 days before 9/11 is heartless and cruel. Shame on you!
2006-09-09 14:52:50 · answer #7 · answered by celticwoman777 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
No, the black box clearly indicates that it was the passengers who took over and the plane then crashed when the melee broke out. Really, at this point what possible difference could it make!
2006-09-09 12:29:07 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
No, the black box tapes clearly show that the passengers took over the plane, but too late.
2006-09-09 12:27:49 · answer #9 · answered by DMBthatsme 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I spoke to an eyewitness and he said nothing about the plane showing signs of being hit before it dove into the ground.
2006-09-09 12:29:14 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋