Just by supressing the term Civil War, we cannot keep our head in the sand while our young men sacrifice their lives. Iraq is history now...and do not repeat Churchill. Churchill was ashamed of it and admitted his mistake. We know Churchill is your hero, but you need not repeat the errors of the hero.
2006-09-09 12:19:41 · 6 answers · asked by spiritualseeker 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
First there shall be no President McCain why put in another face of George? But we as americans should be out of Iraq because it is just like Vietnam in that we are there for selfish reasons for one, two the iraq people far from welcoming as liberators see us as invaders, even the Prime Minister that we support does not support us or our allies, he is for hezbollah and why should we risk our soldiers for a country that shall not stand with us, the world is seeing the truth of this war now one that should have been seen before. It is a civil war and the time to go is now the only reason we do not is because of the oil and the fact that Iran would step in and take over Iraq.
2006-09-09 16:30:56 · answer #1 · answered by billc4u 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Your assumption is that we can not win this war. That's your business. There are plenty of us who see victory in sight and will not let idiots like you turn this war into another Viet Nam by withdrawing early and abandoning the millions of Iraqis who risked life and limb to vote for a better way of life. When we abandoned the Vietnamese, millions of them were killed by the commie scum of the north as will millions of Iraqis if we abandon the middle east to the jihadists.
The enemy has learned that it can not confront coalition forces directly with much profit, so they have changed their tactics to fomenting civil war. If you paid close attention to the news you would realize that this is happening almost entirely in Baghdad, the large, sprawling capitol wherein they are still able to hide. If it were a nation wide problem we could then call it a civil war. If the new Iraqui army was fighting amongst themselves we could then call it a civil war. Bloody as it is (and wars are often bloodiest before they are over) it can not be called a civil war except by those who would like us to lose the struggle for Western civilization.
2006-09-09 12:35:50 · answer #2 · answered by caesar x 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
you're making a really scary aspect. yet i actually do not imagine Hils will be President. Leaving does no longer sparkling up the area, although if Civil conflict erupts. that's in our proper interests to make Iraq a strong democratic state; and a real best pal in a area the position surely Israel stands alongside us. And even as the deaths of our troops is tragic, the objective is properly worth it. no longer to practice that to tug out now will surely propose we may might want to bypass back 10 years from now, and it truly is going to value us two times as many lives then.
2016-11-25 22:39:20 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Before you remove your tin foil hat and return to your parents basement I must point out to you that the craziest thing you have said is President McCain, only in the most twisted fantasy of the press.
2006-09-09 12:27:38 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Nonsense..
2006-09-09 12:21:19 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
president McCain i like how that sounds
2006-09-09 12:25:57 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋