One theory is that America is moving more and more toward a communist-like state; they are regulating guns more and more until soon, like in England, there will be none allowed. They censor what we can say, watch, & hear more and more, all the while distracting us with the latest celebrity gossip, fad diet, scandal or controversey. We go to work each and every day assuming everything will be the same tomorrow because it was the same yesterday and the day before (and because really, there's not a lot else we can do even if we do actually think about it)... All the while not noticing --or worse not caring-- that "they" are gradually tweaking and eroding our freedoms. In other words your question may be an observation of part of a much larger problem.
Then again what do I know?
2006-09-09 11:55:38
·
answer #1
·
answered by cartmansmom 4
·
2⤊
2⤋
I think that the propaganda piece, "Path to 9/11" should be shown in it's entirety AFTER the November elections. It is obvious that this cheesy manipulated pile of crap was created and funded by the the right-wing to sway the electorate (not all that sophisticated to begin with) to vote for candidates who support the Bush regime's rape of America. That ABC would participate in such a sham seems to indicate that they have either been intimidated or infiltrated by the fascist elements trying to totally control America for their own benefit.
2006-09-09 12:26:32
·
answer #2
·
answered by iknowtruthismine 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
Get the facts right: ABC was going to present an event that NEVER happened as if it was real. The Dem's cried foul and rightly so. Powerful Republicans are also crying "foul". The Republicans should do the same thing if it ever happens to them. The ABC production was supposed to have been based entirely on the 9/11 commissions BI-PARTISAN report, and it didn't. ABC had it coming, but you could aways blame the "liberal media"! LOL!!!
2006-09-09 11:40:31
·
answer #3
·
answered by Paul H 6
·
2⤊
3⤋
When did Woody Woodpecker become a neocon??
Oh, and by the way, for the benefit of one of your answerers...of course I could be wrong about this, mind you...but casting my mind way, way back through all those history texts I read...
...there was never a president named "JKF".
And if you can't even get THAT right, God only knows what other jumbled silliness you believe.
Lookin' good for an old bird, Woody!
2006-09-09 12:27:40
·
answer #4
·
answered by St. Hell 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Sometime around the time of JKF?
They tried to censor Truman, but I think only death succeeded. LOL
Edit: John Fitzgerald Kennedy! jFk
Hey, thanks for pointing out my typo Saint Hell. There are times when I type too fast by half and forget to check.
Nice to see there are epitomes of perfection out there. Where would we be without the kindess of strangers? ; )
2006-09-09 11:41:34
·
answer #5
·
answered by tantiemeg 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
the republicans are the ones that won't let the media say what they want to
2006-09-09 11:41:02
·
answer #6
·
answered by rhino_man420 6
·
2⤊
2⤋
Get your facts straight....it's the religious, ''goody 2 shoes'', prudish conservative repukes that would have us have anything CENSORED that could possibly offend ''family'' people.!
2006-09-09 11:39:38
·
answer #7
·
answered by Kiss my Putt! 7
·
4⤊
3⤋