English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Im asking this because i saw Loose Change 2nd Edition, also the CIA & The US FBI has also presented a lot of evidence. That confuses me a lot.

2006-09-09 10:59:51 · 22 answers · asked by devilz_krypt 2 in Politics & Government Politics

22 answers

It was Al-queda. There is no confusion.

2006-09-09 11:02:19 · answer #1 · answered by Kennyp 3 · 4 1

To all the people above me that went into "Brainwashed" mode.. step back.
Loose Change brings many things to the table, ....and I have been to ScrewLoosechange.com .. if that is the best defense for the official story then you should all pack it up and go home. That web site picks and chooses which points to address but leaves gaping holes on other "material" proof items ...and like all such things does it in a condescending manner.. to make the people there that already agree with it's premise feel superior and to make those of us that ask honest questions feel stupid..

But I will tell you as a serious 9/11-file I have sat with Airline pilots, talked with Military and law enforcement personnel. and the reality is ... the evidence doesn't add up. There are many incidents of mishandled forensic and physical evidence gathering, lost or destroyed materials, lack of video footage that could clearly and even more easily defuse and end the controversy.. nothing that would risk national security and yet where is it ? If the Bush crew could proove it otherwise do you think they would leave it to media mouth pieces to bash the honest curiosity of it's citizenry ?

I am willing to challenge anyone on this or any other site to an open debate about the events of 9/11 .. no hyperbole and mud slinging.. just fact for fact. If you feel the evidence is on your side then let's discuss it the public forum ?

I will have the usual rabble call me a whacko and a Tinhat .. but they won't debate it because they "don't really know" .. that's why the 9/11 truth movement is growing and gaining more and more attention.. Time magazine this last week even designated a section "busting the 9/11 myths" of course their framing of the issue is much like that of the screw loose change website.. it is an old intelligence and disinformation trick.. To restructure the conversation in a way that makes the other guy look foolish .. but that's just a game like any other and two can play.

So come one come all and let's debate 9/11 in an open forum ? Anyone ?

2006-09-09 11:06:51 · answer #2 · answered by hardartsystems 3 · 2 2

Okay let's say all the conspiracy theories are total BS. We know that terrorists brought down the towers. Now ask yourself why would they do that. You can get a lot of simple "they hate us" comments which is just mindless rhetoric. If you want to really find out what the cause of the hate is look at how people treated the Middle East by studying foreign affairs and the history of that region prior to 9/11 and draw your own conclusions.

2006-09-09 11:45:41 · answer #3 · answered by Thomas S 4 · 0 0

In our time, those who get into positions of responsibility are no-talent brown-noses, ambitious imbeciles who "know how to" do a job only in the sense that most American boys know how to play baseball but can't even make their high school team. The key to America's being upside-down, with inferior people on top, is that if you don't pay people to go to college, you get what you pay for.

2006-09-09 11:28:21 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Osama bin laden,19 Al-Qa'ida members who are Islamo-Fascist PIGS!!!! The Loose Change movie is a communist front organization propaganda film.

2006-09-09 11:14:51 · answer #5 · answered by Vagabond5879 7 · 0 1

Ultimately, Bin-Laden the sooner the Bxxxxxxx blown to bits the better

2006-09-09 11:05:38 · answer #6 · answered by cornishmaid 4 · 1 2

The planes flew into the building, we know what planes and many of us knew people on those ;planes who lost thier lives.

It is very simple, and that is the problem, it is too simple for people.

next before all the nut cases would have merley read thier stories in the news paper tabloid, now they have blogs and web sites where other nuts join them.

2006-09-09 11:03:28 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

President Clinton for allowing 30 acts against this country and never doing anything about it. Blame President Bush all you want, but follow the years before to see the history of what happened. If they killed him in 1994/5, then he would not have been alive in 2001 to attack us. Please do not forget we were attacked, and these people want to kill us.

2006-09-09 11:08:42 · answer #8 · answered by wmkinger 2 · 1 2

Al Qaeda.

2006-09-09 11:05:57 · answer #9 · answered by Mojo Seeker Of Knowlege 7 · 2 1

Read Crossing the Rubicon by Michael C Ruppert...you will not doubt "who done it" after......also check out links below....THE TRUTH IS OUT THERE!!!

2006-09-09 11:16:15 · answer #10 · answered by MC 7 · 0 1

bin Laden

2006-09-09 11:05:35 · answer #11 · answered by   6 · 2 2

fedest.com, questions and answers