Best bet is probably McCardell.
Clayton may be a viable option but i wouldnt bet on it. Clayton used to be Bledsoe's favourite end zone target, but with Owens there, i am not so sure. As now Bledsoe has Owens for long balls, and Glenn for short.
2006-09-09 11:51:05
·
answer #1
·
answered by ~O.N.E.~ 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
McCardel or Clayton. Porter will hardly see the field, Lelie is going up against a good Vikings DB when he is in there and Jennings is a crap-shoot because the Green Bay offense is pathetic, sorry Brett F.
2006-09-09 18:16:58
·
answer #2
·
answered by Tommy D 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'd go McCardel or Clayton. Porter is having issues in Oakland with his new QB Brooks. Lelie is #3 on the ATL depth chart. Look for Clayton to have bounce back year and McCardel is a proven commodity.
2006-09-09 20:32:13
·
answer #3
·
answered by Grim Meeper 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
KM is the only #1 receiver on that list, you have to start him. KM will probably get 4-6 catches for about 50-60 yards, pretty good for your 3rd receiver.
If you asked me the same question 3 weeks from now, it's a no brainer you would go with Lelie, but ATL has said he will not get a lot of reps this week.
2006-09-09 21:12:09
·
answer #4
·
answered by pbuandl 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Mc Cardell or Lelie...Porter was down graded to 4th wr for the Raiders , Clayton had a sucky year and whos' Jennings ?? must be a rookie...so go with them two.
2006-09-09 18:49:33
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
lelie
2006-09-09 19:07:27
·
answer #6
·
answered by laden d 3
·
0⤊
0⤋