English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Have you guys heard about the 9/11 moving comming out and the democrats are making ABC take out parts of the movie that make them look bad. Dont you think this is against a persons rights to have a movie shown how they want it. The democrats saw nothing wrong with Bush Bashing in the movie Farinehight 911 but all because this movie tells some truth there upset.

I was listing to talk shows about this and its sad also cause everyone wants to blaim Bush for this war and soilders deaths but we wouldnt be in this war if Clinton would of taken out Osama when he had the chance and he even admited he had the chance a couple times but choose not to.

Now i am a republican so you can say what you want about the second part but you have to even agree with me about the first part and how democrats have no right to forced ABC to take out parts of the movie that bash them.

And on a note the movie bash's both sides, so its not like Ferignheight movie and one sided

2006-09-09 09:36:18 · 9 answers · asked by xcef2005 2 in Politics & Government Politics

This movie was based on facts, it wasnt meant to bash but the democrats were mainly mad at the fact that Clinton had serveral chances to get rid of Osama Bin Ladin, the one who caused the 9/11 attacks, but Clinton said that he had no proof to get Osama, which is strange to me considering Aliquda(Spelling Bad I Know lol) was part of the 93 bombing of WTC

2006-09-09 11:00:47 · update #1

9 answers

no i didn't hear about that. a movie is freedom of speech and i think that they should make the movie however they want to show it except if the movie shows the death of a living person. that is wrong b/c life should be celebrated.

2006-09-09 09:40:05 · answer #1 · answered by loretta 4 · 1 1

Is the movie true? If it's not, if it leaves an inaccurate impression of how Bush or Clinton's handled certain events then it is not a true story. The screen play was based on the 9/11 commission report and members of that committee have said it gives the wrong impression of how events unfolded.
If you criticize a president based on facts it's not bashing. Airing a movie with false or misleading statements is bashing, regardless whether it's the Moore movie or this ABC movie of the week.

2006-09-09 16:49:54 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Moore made no secret that his movie was an investigative anti-Bush, anti-invasion documentary. ABC was attempting to sell this movie as a docudrama and claimed to follow the 9/11 Commission report. Truth is, the guy behind the project is an extreme right winger with an objective a few weeks before the national elections. Many of the commission members have expressed concerns.

2006-09-09 16:40:22 · answer #3 · answered by Joe D 6 · 1 1

I don't think this TV special can go much lower than Farenheight 9/11. If a man is bashed for trying to stay calm in front of a 2nd grade class for seven minutes, then I think anything is fair game against the democrat party.

2006-09-09 16:45:49 · answer #4 · answered by dflocks80 4 · 0 1

I think that the propaganda piece, "Path to 9/11" should be shown in it's entirety AFTER the November elections. It is obvious that this cheesy manipulated pile of crap was created and funded by the the right-wing to sway the electorate (not all that sophisticated to begin with) to vote for candidates who support the Bush regime's rape of America. That ABC would participate in such a sham seems to indicate that they have either been intimidated or infiltrated by the fascist elements trying to totally control America for their own benefit.

2006-09-09 19:10:21 · answer #5 · answered by iknowtruthismine 7 · 0 1

You know I don't like some of that movie where the cowboys are always killing those poor Indians, how do I get them to drop parts of that movie, And don't even get me started on Howard Stern.

I did not realise to be able to control the media all I had to be was be a democrat, guess I am changing parties tomorrow and soon I can own the networks.

2006-09-09 16:41:50 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

STOP BLAMING CLINTON! HAD NOTHING 2 DO WITH IT!



George W. Bush is a moran. He should be impeached and executed for high treason of the United States of America.

He was never elected either time.

2006-09-09 17:18:57 · answer #7 · answered by Jeremy© ® ™ 5 · 0 1

George Bush, Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld are flying on Air Force One. The President looks at the Vice President, chuckles, and says, "You know, I could throw a $1000 bill out the window right now and make somebody very happy."

The Vice President shrugs and says, "Well, I could throw 10 $100 bills out the window and make 10 people very happy."

Not to be outdone, the Secretary of Defense says, "Of course, then, I could throw 100 $10 bills out the window and make a hundred people happy."

The pilot rolls his eyes and says to his co-pilot, "Such arrogant asses back there. Hell, I could throw the three of them out the window and make 56 million people really happy."

2006-09-09 16:40:45 · answer #8 · answered by westgaliberty 6 · 3 1

LIBERAL...THY NAME IS HYPOCRISY.. don't you agree?

2006-09-09 16:41:23 · answer #9 · answered by bushfan88 5 · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers