.
2006-09-09 08:55:41 · 17 answers · asked by juliette 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
**think
sorry i was in the zone
2006-09-09 08:58:00 · update #1
english please....
2006-09-09 08:56:37 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
No. The war in Afghanistan is correct and has the potential (if we actually put the resources to it) to create a viable democratic nation in a country where such a thing has never existed.
I think the Israelis should have kept fighting until Hezbollah was completely destroyed. You don't just take half of your antibiotics to fight an infection. If you do, it will come back stronger the next time. No, you take all your medicine and kill the infection.
And honestly, we should have been right there beside Isreal kicking Hezbollah butt...the memory of 200+ American Marines killed by those ignorant fools demanded it.
I wonder if we are really serious about the war on terror....???
2006-09-09 08:59:53 · answer #2 · answered by KERMIT M 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Depends on your angle. Morally speaking you are sending living, breathing humans to their death. These people are someone's husband, wife, sister, brother, grandfather/mother, uncle etc. and on top of that they just want to live and you are sending them into a place where it is likely they won't last that long.
However, you are often sending them in for a reason. Sometimes it is to protect the others left behind in your country, the weaker ones and as stronger ones those who go have made it their obligation to protect the weaker at home. Sometimes though it is to gain something that you couldn't intimidate the enemy into giving you, and in that case it is completely morally wrong. War is one of those deals where it can be morally wrong and right at the same time; but if you ask about my personal beliefs, war is always wrong.
2006-09-09 09:00:45 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
it is the conundrum; conflict is inaccurate. to apply your social gathering, Germany and Japan were incorrect to initiate a conflict hostile to their associates. They attacked with out provocation and enslaved and murdered tens of millions. replaced into it incorrect for america and the U.ok. et al to become in contact contained in the conflict? If conflict being incorrect is an absolute then it replaced into. the area is that there are not any absolutes in actual existence. There must be no want to have armed people roaming our streets, yet we employ police officials to guard us from those who might want to dedicate crimes hostile to us. There must be no want to maintain a armed forces. All that lets might want to do is make sure all the different countries agreed that none people will strive against anymore. yet it is the actual international, and there is continuously someone who feels that they are proper to take yet another's territory and aspects, or that they're some deity's chosen and may spread the sturdy be conscious at gun aspect, or that their modern new type of authorities desires to presented with the help of tanks and planes. it would want to be fantastic if there have been no conflict, yet i imagine that the armed forces is guaranteed a job for a lengthy time period. like it or no longer, the right thanks to stay away from a conflict is to be the six hundred pound gorilla contained in the room.
2016-11-25 22:23:42 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. War is not a great fun thing, but it is the right thing a lot of the time. What would have happened if we hadn't gone into World War two? We would probably be speaking ing German and would be under the rule of a tiranical dictator.
2006-09-09 08:58:55 · answer #5 · answered by John Z 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No.
War in itself is bad, and I'd like to see as little of it as possible. But the fact is, when someone starts oppressing either you or someone else, and there's no way to stop it except through military force, what are you going to do? Unfortunately, sometimes war is necessary.
2006-09-09 08:59:46 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
War is not always wrong especially when your country was attacked on 9/11/01 by Islamo-Fascist terrorists.
2006-09-09 08:59:00 · answer #7 · answered by Vagabond5879 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Right if you were attacked, wrong if its for a crazy reason like war against americans
2006-09-09 09:01:45 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
War is never a good thing. I'm not even certain that it's a right and wrong issue. More of necessary or unnnecessary issue.
2006-09-09 08:58:18 · answer #9 · answered by tjjone 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
well I personally hate war. but I guess sometimes there's no choice, it's not like there will ever be peace in the world
2006-09-09 09:11:39 · answer #10 · answered by halfpint 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes.
2006-09-09 09:00:59 · answer #11 · answered by Jesus W. 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋