*cough*
2006-09-09 08:48:26 · 9 answers · asked by Marianne not Ginger™ 7 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
Id depends. A man with a subpoena would fall under the statues of fraud. It could be a comity of errors. If things come too quickly it might be a wrongful discharge. A lawyer with a subpoena would have a nulla bona if he was jus naturale and would probably have to eat escrow. That he could only offer an illusory promise would be ipso facto when people saw his ipse dixit. His prima facie would be beet red. There is nothing so heart rendering as a lawyer's plaintiff cry when his ego has been injured.
2006-09-09 19:01:23 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Because, lawyers know that once you've had a subpoena you'll never be the same again.
2006-09-09 17:14:36 · answer #2 · answered by gotalife 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Sub? As in submarine? Or sub-atomic? Or substitute? Because I think their substantial egos are in fact subliminally the substitute for what little must be there on a subconscious level. It would explain why their subordinates are typically subdued into submission.
Or on a less subtle note- perhaps they are mostly sub-human.
2006-09-10 01:13:19 · answer #3 · answered by Antny 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Most people who have doctoral degrees and hold people's lives in their hands get big egos, including doctors, high-ranking priests, and many lawyers.
But it's a cute joke.
2006-09-09 19:29:35 · answer #4 · answered by coragryph 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hey, baby, once you've been subpoenad from a lawyer with no legs you can never go back.
2006-09-09 18:23:09 · answer #5 · answered by ? 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Thats the only thing those lawyers can depend on.What would they be without their ego's.
I personally prefere Waffles...
2006-09-09 16:22:49 · answer #6 · answered by Einstein 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
That's a very good question Dee. Why do we let ourselves be represented by sub anythings.
2006-09-09 21:53:57 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
It's compensation.
2006-09-09 16:09:21 · answer #8 · answered by robert2011@sbcglobal.net 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
That is very good actually
2006-09-09 19:45:36 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋